When do peers influence adolescent males' risk taking? Examining decision making under conditions of risk and ambiguity. / Lloyd, Alex; Doering, Anna.

In: Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 32, No. 5, 12.2019, p. 613-626.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Published

Standard

When do peers influence adolescent males' risk taking? Examining decision making under conditions of risk and ambiguity. / Lloyd, Alex; Doering, Anna.

In: Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 32, No. 5, 12.2019, p. 613-626.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Lloyd, Alex ; Doering, Anna. / When do peers influence adolescent males' risk taking? Examining decision making under conditions of risk and ambiguity. In: Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 2019 ; Vol. 32, No. 5. pp. 613-626.

BibTeX

@article{b5846bd2a42843cf822fc5cee8550f34,
title = "When do peers influence adolescent males' risk taking? Examining decision making under conditions of risk and ambiguity",
abstract = "Risk taking is highly prevalent among adolescent males, and a range of studies have shown that decisions become riskier if a peer is present. However, previous studies have typically provided participants with explicit probabilities of risk in each situation. This does not accurately reflect adolescents' real‐world risk taking, where decisions are made in ambiguous situations alongside their peers. Aiming for a more ecologically valid design, the present experiment manipulated situational ambiguity and examined its interplay with group decision making and developmental factors. Adolescent males (N = 202) aged 12–15 completed a “Wheel of Fortune” task and then self‐reported their score, presenting an opportunity to cheat as a measure of antisocial risk taking. As predicted, adolescents were more likely to take risks when probabilities were ambiguous rather than explicit. Further, higher levels of gambling choices were made by groups in ambiguous, but not risk situations. Age significantly predicted gambling in ambiguous conditions, whereas developmental dispositions (risk perception, reward sensitivity, and inhibitory control) did not play a role. Findings provide an insight into the social and situational conditions under which adolescent males engage in reckless behavior.",
author = "Alex Lloyd and Anna Doering",
year = "2019",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1002/bdm.2141",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "613--626",
journal = "Journal of Behavioral Decision Making",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - When do peers influence adolescent males' risk taking? Examining decision making under conditions of risk and ambiguity

AU - Lloyd, Alex

AU - Doering, Anna

PY - 2019/12

Y1 - 2019/12

N2 - Risk taking is highly prevalent among adolescent males, and a range of studies have shown that decisions become riskier if a peer is present. However, previous studies have typically provided participants with explicit probabilities of risk in each situation. This does not accurately reflect adolescents' real‐world risk taking, where decisions are made in ambiguous situations alongside their peers. Aiming for a more ecologically valid design, the present experiment manipulated situational ambiguity and examined its interplay with group decision making and developmental factors. Adolescent males (N = 202) aged 12–15 completed a “Wheel of Fortune” task and then self‐reported their score, presenting an opportunity to cheat as a measure of antisocial risk taking. As predicted, adolescents were more likely to take risks when probabilities were ambiguous rather than explicit. Further, higher levels of gambling choices were made by groups in ambiguous, but not risk situations. Age significantly predicted gambling in ambiguous conditions, whereas developmental dispositions (risk perception, reward sensitivity, and inhibitory control) did not play a role. Findings provide an insight into the social and situational conditions under which adolescent males engage in reckless behavior.

AB - Risk taking is highly prevalent among adolescent males, and a range of studies have shown that decisions become riskier if a peer is present. However, previous studies have typically provided participants with explicit probabilities of risk in each situation. This does not accurately reflect adolescents' real‐world risk taking, where decisions are made in ambiguous situations alongside their peers. Aiming for a more ecologically valid design, the present experiment manipulated situational ambiguity and examined its interplay with group decision making and developmental factors. Adolescent males (N = 202) aged 12–15 completed a “Wheel of Fortune” task and then self‐reported their score, presenting an opportunity to cheat as a measure of antisocial risk taking. As predicted, adolescents were more likely to take risks when probabilities were ambiguous rather than explicit. Further, higher levels of gambling choices were made by groups in ambiguous, but not risk situations. Age significantly predicted gambling in ambiguous conditions, whereas developmental dispositions (risk perception, reward sensitivity, and inhibitory control) did not play a role. Findings provide an insight into the social and situational conditions under which adolescent males engage in reckless behavior.

U2 - 10.1002/bdm.2141

DO - 10.1002/bdm.2141

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 613

EP - 626

JO - Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

JF - Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

IS - 5

ER -