Abstract
This chapter uses U.S.-led economic sanctions on Iran to demonstrate the utility of employing quantitative methods in critical, emancipatory analysis in Security Studies. It critiques the purely positivist application of quantitative tools that dominates the field, and suggests that quantitative (particularly mathematical) methods can serve critical ends. By way of an example, it uses game theory to demonstrate that a state’s sense of self (or ontological security) can incentivise the use of harmful sanctions against their own material interest (and against the interests of others). It then suggests other mathematical methods that would be useful in a critical analysis of the sanctions regime on Iran.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Critical Approaches to Security |
Subtitle of host publication | An Introduction to Theories and Methods |
Editors | Laura Shepherd |
Place of Publication | London |
Publisher | Routledge |
Chapter | 9 |
Pages | 103-117 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Edition | 1st |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780203076873 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780415680172, 9780415680165 |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2012 |
Keywords
- methodology
- quantitative
- qualitative
- positivism
- postpositivsm
- critical security
- security studies