Coordinating outcomes measurement in ataxia research: do some widely used generic rating scales tick the boxes?

Afsane Riazi; Stefan J Cano; J Mark Cooper; Jane L Bradley; Anthony H V Schapira; Jeremy C Hobart

doi:10.1002/mds.20985

Coordinating outcomes measurement in ataxia research: do some widely used generic rating scales tick the boxes?

Afsane Riazi, Stefan J Cano, J Mark Cooper, Jane L Bradley, Anthony H V Schapira, Jeremy C Hobart

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

328 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1396-403
Number of pages	8
Journal	Movement Disorders
Volume	21
Issue number	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.20985
Publication status	Published - 2006

Keywords

Activities of Daily Living
Adolescent
Adult
Female
Friedreich Ataxia
Health Status Indicators
Health Surveys
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neurologic Examination
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Psychometrics
Quality of Life
Questionnaires
Reproducibility of Results
Sickness Impact Profile

Access to Document

10.1002/mds.20985

MDS Riazi 2006Accepted author manuscript, 246 KB

Cite this

@article{bd29220d1baa49379ddd1f68abf69885,

title = "Coordinating outcomes measurement in ataxia research: do some widely used generic rating scales tick the boxes?",

keywords = "Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Friedreich Ataxia, Health Status Indicators, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neurologic Examination, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Sickness Impact Profile",

author = "Afsane Riazi and Cano, {Stefan J} and Cooper, {J Mark} and Bradley, {Jane L} and Schapira, {Anthony H V} and Hobart, {Jeremy C}",

year = "2006",

doi = "10.1002/mds.20985",

language = "English",

volume = "21",

pages = "1396--403",

journal = "Movement Disorders",

issn = "0885-3185",