TY - JOUR
T1 - Analytic atheism
T2 - A cross-culturally weak and fickle phenomenon?
AU - Gervais, Will
AU - van Elk, Michiel
AU - Xygalatas, Dimitris
AU - McKay, Ryan
AU - Aveyard, Mark
AU - Buchtel, Emma
AU - Dar-Nimrod, Ilan
AU - Kundtová Klocová, Eva
AU - Ramsay, Jonathan
AU - Riekki, Tapani
AU - Svedholm-Häkkinen, Annika
AU - Bulbulia, Joseph
PY - 2018/5
Y1 - 2018/5
N2 - Religious belief is a topic of longstanding interest to psychological science, but the psychology of religious disbelief is a relative newcomer. One prominently discussed model is analytic atheism, wherein cognitive reflection, as measured with the Cognitive Reflection Test, overrides religious intuitions and instruction. Consistent with this model, performance-based measures of cognitive reflection predict religious disbelief in WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, & Democratic) samples. However, the generality of analytic atheism remains unknown. Drawing on a large global sample (N = 3461) from 13 religiously, demographically, and culturally diverse societies, we find that analytic atheism as usually assessed is in fact quite fickle cross-culturally, appearing robustly only in aggregate analyses and in three individual countries. The results provide additional evidence for culture’s effects on core beliefs.
AB - Religious belief is a topic of longstanding interest to psychological science, but the psychology of religious disbelief is a relative newcomer. One prominently discussed model is analytic atheism, wherein cognitive reflection, as measured with the Cognitive Reflection Test, overrides religious intuitions and instruction. Consistent with this model, performance-based measures of cognitive reflection predict religious disbelief in WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, & Democratic) samples. However, the generality of analytic atheism remains unknown. Drawing on a large global sample (N = 3461) from 13 religiously, demographically, and culturally diverse societies, we find that analytic atheism as usually assessed is in fact quite fickle cross-culturally, appearing robustly only in aggregate analyses and in three individual countries. The results provide additional evidence for culture’s effects on core beliefs.
M3 - Article
SN - 1930-2975
VL - 13
SP - 268
EP - 274
JO - Judgment and Decision Making
JF - Judgment and Decision Making
IS - 3
ER -