Taking Rorty Seriously : Pragmatism, Metaphilosophy, and Truth. / Gascoigne, Neil; Bacon, Michael.

In: Inquiry (United Kingdom), 16.09.2020, p. 1-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

E-pub ahead of print

Documents

  • Accepted Manuscript

    Accepted author manuscript, 220 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 16/03/22

Abstract

Although Rorty’s work has become a touchstone for evaluating the metaphilosophical stance appropriate for pragmatism, the suspicion prevails that his ‘neopragmatism’ (NeoP) is undermined by a failure to take first-order philosophical problems seriously. We propose that this imputation is grounded in the assumption that he attempts to distinguish metaphilosophy from philosophy in order to insulate the former from the latter, and against it argue that pragmatism’s experimental attitude towards inquiry entails that there is and can be no such separation. We go on to suggest that philosophers such as Misak who define their ‘new pragmatist’ (NewP) position partly in opposition to Rorty’s, insist on this separation because they feel themselves answerable to some ‘transcendental’ urge. The conviction that to reject that urge is to reject the calling of philosophy itself is manifest in the debate between NeoP and NewP on the role of truth-talk. We argue that acceding to this urge prevents us from taking philosophy seriously, and by extension from taking Rorty’s contribution to philosophy in like fashion.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalInquiry (United Kingdom)
Early online date16 Sep 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 16 Sep 2020
This open access research output is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

ID: 38258892