Measuring supernatural belief implicitly using the Affect Misattribution Procedure. / Ross, Robert; Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L.; Gervais, Will; Jong, Jonathan; Lanman, Jonathan; McKay, Ryan; Pennycook, Gordon.

In: Religion, Brain & Behavior, 24.06.2019, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

E-pub ahead of print


  • Accepted Manuscript

    Accepted author manuscript, 3 MB, Word document

    Embargo ends: 24/06/20


Asking about religious beliefs, or lack thereof, is a sensitive and complex issue. Due to cultural norms, people may be motivated to respond in a socially desirable way. In addition, deliberating about beliefs may yield different responses than intuition-based responses. To develop a better understanding of the relationship between intuitions and self-reported beliefs, we developed a new implicit measure of supernatural belief. Specifically, we adapted the Affective Misattribution Procedure (AMP) to measure supernatural belief. In a preregistered online study of 404 American participants, we found that the strength of associations between supernatural entities (e.g., god, devil, heaven) and the concept “real” (as opposed to the concept “imaginary”) predicted self-reported supernatural belief and self-reported religious behavior, and these associations were of comparable magnitude to those found in studies where supernatural belief was measured implicitly using the Implicit Association Test (IAT). These results provide provisional evidence that the AMP can be used as an implicit measure of supernatural belief.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalReligion, Brain & Behavior
Early online date24 Jun 2019
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 24 Jun 2019
This open access research output is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

ID: 33655376