Clouding the Judgment of Domestic Violence Law : Victim Blaming by Institutional Stakeholders in Cambodia. / Brickell, Katherine.

In: Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 32, No. 9, 01.05.2017, p. 1358-1378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Clouding the Judgment of Domestic Violence Law : Victim Blaming by Institutional Stakeholders in Cambodia. / Brickell, Katherine.

In: Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 32, No. 9, 01.05.2017, p. 1358-1378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{f2bf0b28712f402db72c0d088365fe35,
title = "Clouding the Judgment of Domestic Violence Law: Victim Blaming by Institutional Stakeholders in Cambodia",
abstract = "This paper examines victims{\textquoteright} purported complicity in the judicial failures of domestic violence law to protect them in Cambodia. It is based on three years (2012-2015) of research in Siem Reap and Pursat Provinces on the everyday politics of the 2005 {\textquoteleft}Law on the Prevention of Domestic Violence and the Protection of the Victims{\textquoteright} (DV Law). The project questioned why investments in DV Law are faltering and took a multi-stakeholder approach to do so. In addition to forty interviews with female domestic violence victims, the research included fifty interviews with legal and health professionals, NGO workers, low and high-ranking police officers, religious figures and local government authority leaders who each have an occupational investment in the implementation and enforcement of DV Law. Forming the backbone of the paper, the findings from this latter sample reveal how women are construed not only as barriers {\textquoteleft}clouding the judgment of law{\textquoteright} but also as actors denying the agency of institutional stakeholders (and law itself) to bring perpetrators to account. The findings suggest that DV Law has the potential to entrench, rather than diminish, an environment of victim blaming. In turn, the paper signals the importance of research on, and better professional support of, intermediaries who (discursively) administrate the relationship between DV Law and the victims/citizens it seeks to protect. ",
author = "Katherine Brickell",
year = "2017",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0886260515588919",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "1358--1378",
journal = "Journal of Interpersonal Violence",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clouding the Judgment of Domestic Violence Law

T2 - Victim Blaming by Institutional Stakeholders in Cambodia

AU - Brickell, Katherine

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - This paper examines victims’ purported complicity in the judicial failures of domestic violence law to protect them in Cambodia. It is based on three years (2012-2015) of research in Siem Reap and Pursat Provinces on the everyday politics of the 2005 ‘Law on the Prevention of Domestic Violence and the Protection of the Victims’ (DV Law). The project questioned why investments in DV Law are faltering and took a multi-stakeholder approach to do so. In addition to forty interviews with female domestic violence victims, the research included fifty interviews with legal and health professionals, NGO workers, low and high-ranking police officers, religious figures and local government authority leaders who each have an occupational investment in the implementation and enforcement of DV Law. Forming the backbone of the paper, the findings from this latter sample reveal how women are construed not only as barriers ‘clouding the judgment of law’ but also as actors denying the agency of institutional stakeholders (and law itself) to bring perpetrators to account. The findings suggest that DV Law has the potential to entrench, rather than diminish, an environment of victim blaming. In turn, the paper signals the importance of research on, and better professional support of, intermediaries who (discursively) administrate the relationship between DV Law and the victims/citizens it seeks to protect.

AB - This paper examines victims’ purported complicity in the judicial failures of domestic violence law to protect them in Cambodia. It is based on three years (2012-2015) of research in Siem Reap and Pursat Provinces on the everyday politics of the 2005 ‘Law on the Prevention of Domestic Violence and the Protection of the Victims’ (DV Law). The project questioned why investments in DV Law are faltering and took a multi-stakeholder approach to do so. In addition to forty interviews with female domestic violence victims, the research included fifty interviews with legal and health professionals, NGO workers, low and high-ranking police officers, religious figures and local government authority leaders who each have an occupational investment in the implementation and enforcement of DV Law. Forming the backbone of the paper, the findings from this latter sample reveal how women are construed not only as barriers ‘clouding the judgment of law’ but also as actors denying the agency of institutional stakeholders (and law itself) to bring perpetrators to account. The findings suggest that DV Law has the potential to entrench, rather than diminish, an environment of victim blaming. In turn, the paper signals the importance of research on, and better professional support of, intermediaries who (discursively) administrate the relationship between DV Law and the victims/citizens it seeks to protect.

U2 - 10.1177/0886260515588919

DO - 10.1177/0886260515588919

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 1358

EP - 1378

JO - Journal of Interpersonal Violence

JF - Journal of Interpersonal Violence

IS - 9

ER -