British Politics Toward Axis Reprisals in Occupied Greece : Whithall vs SOE. / Dyson, Tom.

In: Contemporary British History, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2002, p. 11-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Published

Standard

British Politics Toward Axis Reprisals in Occupied Greece : Whithall vs SOE. / Dyson, Tom.

In: Contemporary British History, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2002, p. 11-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Dyson, T 2002, 'British Politics Toward Axis Reprisals in Occupied Greece: Whithall vs SOE', Contemporary British History, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 11-28.

APA

Vancouver

Author

Dyson, Tom. / British Politics Toward Axis Reprisals in Occupied Greece : Whithall vs SOE. In: Contemporary British History. 2002 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 11-28.

BibTeX

@article{2bb77e054d314970b215ad859467877b,
title = "British Politics Toward Axis Reprisals in Occupied Greece: Whithall vs SOE",
abstract = "This article has two purposes. First, by means of archival and interview research itcontributes an original empirical investigation of British wartime policy on an issuethat has been neglected in the literature. The article sheds light on the way in which the difficult moral issue of reprisals was handled in Whitehall. Second, it seeks to compare four different interpretations of the way in which this policy developed. These models are drawn from fundamentally divergent accounts of how states make policy. The article uncovers a dominant realist paradigm in Whitehall whose influence is reflected in the explanatory power of the models of bureaucratic politics and symbolic politics. At the same time Special Operations Executive (SOE) officers sought to inject a sense of moral obligation into policy by acting as policy entrepreneurs. However, structural factors were ultimately crucial in shaping British policy. The conclusion identifies the implications of this approach for further research.",
author = "Tom Dyson",
year = "2002",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "11--28",
journal = "Contemporary British History",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - British Politics Toward Axis Reprisals in Occupied Greece

T2 - Whithall vs SOE

AU - Dyson, Tom

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - This article has two purposes. First, by means of archival and interview research itcontributes an original empirical investigation of British wartime policy on an issuethat has been neglected in the literature. The article sheds light on the way in which the difficult moral issue of reprisals was handled in Whitehall. Second, it seeks to compare four different interpretations of the way in which this policy developed. These models are drawn from fundamentally divergent accounts of how states make policy. The article uncovers a dominant realist paradigm in Whitehall whose influence is reflected in the explanatory power of the models of bureaucratic politics and symbolic politics. At the same time Special Operations Executive (SOE) officers sought to inject a sense of moral obligation into policy by acting as policy entrepreneurs. However, structural factors were ultimately crucial in shaping British policy. The conclusion identifies the implications of this approach for further research.

AB - This article has two purposes. First, by means of archival and interview research itcontributes an original empirical investigation of British wartime policy on an issuethat has been neglected in the literature. The article sheds light on the way in which the difficult moral issue of reprisals was handled in Whitehall. Second, it seeks to compare four different interpretations of the way in which this policy developed. These models are drawn from fundamentally divergent accounts of how states make policy. The article uncovers a dominant realist paradigm in Whitehall whose influence is reflected in the explanatory power of the models of bureaucratic politics and symbolic politics. At the same time Special Operations Executive (SOE) officers sought to inject a sense of moral obligation into policy by acting as policy entrepreneurs. However, structural factors were ultimately crucial in shaping British policy. The conclusion identifies the implications of this approach for further research.

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 11

EP - 28

JO - Contemporary British History

JF - Contemporary British History

IS - 1

ER -