@inbook{9ce6ccd4ea7247a4977b23b6b5285bb0,
title = "The Utopian City in Tacitus{\textquoteright} Agricola",
abstract = "This article uses the depiction of the city in the Agricola 21, a key text of Romanisation, to examine Tacitean imperial politics and the relationship between space and power. Following a growing tradition of reading the Agricola as a geographical as much as a historical text, the article argues for Tacitean ambivalence as fundamental to the Agricola, not in the sense of Tacitus being undecided about empire; ambivalence is not manifest in a dichotomous reading of empire as Romans against barbarians, but in the subject position of Tacitus and his assumed readers and in their relationship to the imperial project. Ambivalence constructs a third space which is not a temporal stage (a transitional moment in the historical process of acculturation, between barbarian and Roman), but foundational: this ambivalence exists in contrast and opposition to the utopian visions of an imperial city that we find in the Agricola, a city which is {\textquoteleft}flat{\textquoteright} or one-dimensional.",
keywords = "Space, Tacitus, Lefebvre, Imperialism, Rome",
author = "Richard Alston",
year = "2018",
month = mar,
day = "22",
doi = "10.1093/oso/9780198768098.003.0011",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780198768098",
pages = "235--259",
editor = "William Fitzgerald and Efrossini Spentzou",
booktitle = "The Production of Space in Latin Literature",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
}