Abstract
This survey of terrorism research focused on research studies published in the first five years after the 9/11 attacks. It highlights a number of positive trends which can be seen in this initial period after 9/11. To begin with, it is clear that more researchers are working on the subject than before and there has been a real increase in collaborative studies. This allows studies to be more ambitious in both data-collection and data analysis, though there has only been a very small shift away from literature review-based research. There has, however, been a much more promising increase in the use of descriptive and inferential statistical analysis. The use of inferential statistics on terrorism data in particular has more than trebled since 9/11, a trend which can only help improve the reliability and validity of the conclusions being reached by researchers. Admittedly, this is an increase starting from an extremely low level indeed (and still compares poorly to core journals in other areas) but it is unquestionably a major step in the right direction.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Terrorism Informatics |
Subtitle of host publication | Knowledge Management and Data Mining for Homeland Security |
Editors | Hsinchun Chen, Edna Reid, Joshua Sinai, Andrew Silke, Boaz Ganor |
Place of Publication | New York |
Publisher | Springer |
Chapter | 2 |
Pages | 27-50 |
Number of pages | 24 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780387716138 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780387716121, 9781489998149 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2008 |
Keywords
- terrorism
- terrorism studies
- research on terrorism
- 9/11
- Impact of 9/11