Fiscal Decentralization, inequality and bailout: lessons from Brazil’s debt crisis

Giovanni Facchini, Cecilia Testa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


This paper develops a simple two-period model of public good provision within a federation. A national public good is provided to both states by the federal government, while a local public good is supplied by each state government. The federal government levies a proportional income tax, and in each period the state
governments receive a share of the revenues collected equal to the amount needed to finance the first best provision of the local public good. In the first period the local governments can also use borrowing to finance the provision of the public good, but any debt contracted must be repaid in the second period. We show that when the states face a hard budget constraint, they do not find it optimal to increase the provision of the local public good above the first best level guaranteed by the federal grant. However, if the federal government cannot credibly commit not to bail-out the states, then the local governments may find it optimal to borrow in order to increase the provision of the public good above the first best in the first period. Furthermore, we show that the commitment problem is more likely to arise vis-´a-vis states whose default results in a negative
externality on the federation. Hence, those states are more likely to carry on budget deficits and benefit from a federal bail-out.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)333-344
JournalQuarterly Review of Economics and Finance
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2008


  • Fiscal federalism
  • State government debt
  • Default
  • Soft budget constraint

Cite this