Abstract
In recent decades the practice of violence risk assessment and use of violence risk assessment instruments has become widespread in the criminal justice system. How are courts reacting to these developments? Herein the findings of a survey of Canadian case law are reported. Using Quick Law 35 cases were systematically identified in which judges commented on expert evidence regarding violence risk. Judicial comments were summarized with respect to evaluator qualifications, assessment procedures used, and presentation of findings and opinions. Findings indicate a wide variety of judicial preferences including the skill and knowledge of the evaluator, the type of information used, the description of findings and procedures, and the applicability of legal rules. Although potentially useful to evaluators caution is urged regarding the incorporation of some judicial preferences.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 287-296 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | International Journal of Forensic Mental Health |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 18 Dec 2013 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Keywords
- Violence risk assessment report
- criminal court
- police
- expert evidence
- expert witnesses