Abstract
The effects of context reinstatement as means of enhancing 5- and 6-year-old children’s event memory in repeated interviews after a 6-month delay were examined. Children were interviewed immediately after the event (baseline interview) and twice at a 6-month delay, with 24-hours between interviews. The first 6-month interview was conducted in a perfect-context reinstatement (N=15), imperfect-context reinstatement (N=16), or no-context reinstatement (N=15) condition. The second 6-month interview was conducted 24 hours later with no-context reinstatement for all children. Context reinstatement attenuated the effects of delay on recall. The accuracy of the details reported was greater in the perfect-context compared to the imperfect-context and no-context conditions. Details repeated between the immediate-baseline interview and in the first 6-month interview were more accurate than details repeated between the first and second 6-month interview. There was no increase in recall (hypermnesia) across the first and second 6-month interviews in any condition. Practical implications of these findings are discussed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-17 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Applied Cognitive Psychology |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 24 Jul 2006 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2007 |