“Which Men?” How an Intersectional Perspective on Men and Masculinities Helps Explain Women's Political Underrepresentation. / Childs, Sarah; Hughes, Melanie.

In: Politics and Gender, Vol. 14, No. 2, 06.2018, p. 282-287.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Published

Abstract

Progress toward gender equality in politics is striking. With the help of electoral gender quotas in more than 130 countries, women's national legislative representation more than doubled in the last 20 years. Other historically marginalized groups—racial, ethnic, and religious minorities, immigrants, and indigenous peoples—are also increasingly making their way into our parliaments. Political institutions are, then, more inclusive today than they have ever been. Yet equal representation has not been fully realized: some marginalized groups have seen a decline, and men from dominant social and economic groups—hereafter “elite men”—remain numerically dominant. Globally, there are no known cases in which elite men do not hold a disproportionately high share of positions in national elective office (Hughes 2015).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)282-287
Number of pages6
JournalPolitics and Gender
Volume14
Issue number2
Early online date22 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018
This open access research output is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

ID: 38090733