Well-being: Objectivism,subjectivism or sobjectivism? / MacLeod, Andrew.

In: Journal of Happiness Studies, 2014, p. 1-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Well-being: Objectivism,subjectivism or sobjectivism? / MacLeod, Andrew.

In: Journal of Happiness Studies, 2014, p. 1-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

MacLeod, Andrew. / Well-being: Objectivism,subjectivism or sobjectivism?. In: Journal of Happiness Studies. 2014 ; pp. 1-17.

BibTeX

@article{df7759585a2c445c952684906918d21c,
title = "Well-being: Objectivism,subjectivism or sobjectivism?",
abstract = "Well-being is defined in a range of different ways, most notably in the psychological and philosophical literatures. A dimensional scheme is presented that locates the variety of approaches to well-being according to how much they define it by a person{\textquoteright}s positive subjective state as opposed to requiring the presence of a range of other, more objective life goods (e.g., achievement, relationships, etc.). Adopting a dimensional model allows variations from the traditional subjectivist and objectivist positions, including a variety of mixed subjective and objective (sobjective) positions. Sobjectivist positions vary in the relative weighting of feeling states and more objective elements, as well as how these two different elements are seen as relating to each other. The dimensional model also has the important effect of enabling psychological and philosophical thinking about well-being to be integrated despite their differences in emphases and concerns. A number of different ways that these two aspects can be combined are outlined, including a two-tier model with happiness as a final good and other goods having value to the extent that they lead to happiness. ",
keywords = "well-being; subjectivism, objectivism, hedonia, eudaimonia",
author = "Andrew MacLeod",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s10902-014-9561-0",
language = "English",
pages = "1--17",
journal = "Journal of Happiness Studies",
issn = "1389-4978",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Well-being: Objectivism,subjectivism or sobjectivism?

AU - MacLeod, Andrew

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Well-being is defined in a range of different ways, most notably in the psychological and philosophical literatures. A dimensional scheme is presented that locates the variety of approaches to well-being according to how much they define it by a person’s positive subjective state as opposed to requiring the presence of a range of other, more objective life goods (e.g., achievement, relationships, etc.). Adopting a dimensional model allows variations from the traditional subjectivist and objectivist positions, including a variety of mixed subjective and objective (sobjective) positions. Sobjectivist positions vary in the relative weighting of feeling states and more objective elements, as well as how these two different elements are seen as relating to each other. The dimensional model also has the important effect of enabling psychological and philosophical thinking about well-being to be integrated despite their differences in emphases and concerns. A number of different ways that these two aspects can be combined are outlined, including a two-tier model with happiness as a final good and other goods having value to the extent that they lead to happiness.

AB - Well-being is defined in a range of different ways, most notably in the psychological and philosophical literatures. A dimensional scheme is presented that locates the variety of approaches to well-being according to how much they define it by a person’s positive subjective state as opposed to requiring the presence of a range of other, more objective life goods (e.g., achievement, relationships, etc.). Adopting a dimensional model allows variations from the traditional subjectivist and objectivist positions, including a variety of mixed subjective and objective (sobjective) positions. Sobjectivist positions vary in the relative weighting of feeling states and more objective elements, as well as how these two different elements are seen as relating to each other. The dimensional model also has the important effect of enabling psychological and philosophical thinking about well-being to be integrated despite their differences in emphases and concerns. A number of different ways that these two aspects can be combined are outlined, including a two-tier model with happiness as a final good and other goods having value to the extent that they lead to happiness.

KW - well-being; subjectivism, objectivism, hedonia, eudaimonia

U2 - 10.1007/s10902-014-9561-0

DO - 10.1007/s10902-014-9561-0

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 17

JO - Journal of Happiness Studies

JF - Journal of Happiness Studies

SN - 1389-4978

ER -