To Be or Not to Be a Scientist? / Chevalier, Arnaud.

In: Research in Labor Economics, Vol. 45, 11.05.2017, p. 1-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Published

Documents

Abstract

Employers regularly complain of a shortage of qualified scientists and advocate that to remain competitive more scientists need to be trained. However, using a survey of graduates from British universities, I report that 3 years after graduation less than 50% of graduates from science subjects are working in a scientific occupation.

Accounting for selection into major and occupation type, I estimate the wages of graduates and report that the wage premium of science graduates only occurs when these graduates are matched to a scientific occupation – and not because science skills are in demand in all occupations. I also provide additional evidence to assess whether science graduates are pushed or pulled into non-scientific occupations. Altogether, the evidence does not support the claim that science graduates are pulled by better conditions, financial or otherwise, into non-scientific jobs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-39
Number of pages39
JournalResearch in Labor Economics
Volume45
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 May 2017
This open access research output is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

ID: 27540756