The False Consensus Effect: Deconstruction and Reconstruction of an Anomaly. / Engelmann, D; Strobel, M.

Egham, 2004.

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

The False Consensus Effect: Deconstruction and Reconstruction of an Anomaly. / Engelmann, D; Strobel, M.

Egham, 2004.

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@techreport{accb5d3f2fce4f18bea3bbc561fd9d34,
title = "The False Consensus Effect: Deconstruction and Reconstruction of an Anomaly",
abstract = "We present a striking example of the deconstruction and reconstruction or an anomaly. In line with previous experiments we show in a one-shot setting that the allegedly robust false consensus effect disappears if representative information is readily available. But the effect reappears if a small cognitive effort is required to retrieve the information. Most subjects apparently ignore valuable information if it is not handed to them on a silver platter. We conclude that the relevance of the false consensus effect depends on the difficulty of the information retrieval and that the underlying mechanisms is an information processing deficiency rather than egocentricity. Moreover, we discuss the potential relevance of our findings for other well-known effects like the winner's curse and overconfidence.",
keywords = "False Consensus, Information Processing, Anomalies, Experimental Economics",
author = "D Engelmann and M Strobel",
year = "2004",
month = oct,
day = "10",
language = "English",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - The False Consensus Effect: Deconstruction and Reconstruction of an Anomaly

AU - Engelmann, D

AU - Strobel, M

PY - 2004/10/10

Y1 - 2004/10/10

N2 - We present a striking example of the deconstruction and reconstruction or an anomaly. In line with previous experiments we show in a one-shot setting that the allegedly robust false consensus effect disappears if representative information is readily available. But the effect reappears if a small cognitive effort is required to retrieve the information. Most subjects apparently ignore valuable information if it is not handed to them on a silver platter. We conclude that the relevance of the false consensus effect depends on the difficulty of the information retrieval and that the underlying mechanisms is an information processing deficiency rather than egocentricity. Moreover, we discuss the potential relevance of our findings for other well-known effects like the winner's curse and overconfidence.

AB - We present a striking example of the deconstruction and reconstruction or an anomaly. In line with previous experiments we show in a one-shot setting that the allegedly robust false consensus effect disappears if representative information is readily available. But the effect reappears if a small cognitive effort is required to retrieve the information. Most subjects apparently ignore valuable information if it is not handed to them on a silver platter. We conclude that the relevance of the false consensus effect depends on the difficulty of the information retrieval and that the underlying mechanisms is an information processing deficiency rather than egocentricity. Moreover, we discuss the potential relevance of our findings for other well-known effects like the winner's curse and overconfidence.

KW - False Consensus

KW - Information Processing

KW - Anomalies

KW - Experimental Economics

M3 - Working paper

BT - The False Consensus Effect: Deconstruction and Reconstruction of an Anomaly

CY - Egham

ER -