'The Beast Below' : Doctor Who and the popular negotiation of constitutional values . / Yuratich, David.

In: Journal of Popular Television, Vol. 6, No. 2, 01.06.2018, p. 227-240.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Published

Standard

'The Beast Below' : Doctor Who and the popular negotiation of constitutional values . / Yuratich, David.

In: Journal of Popular Television, Vol. 6, No. 2, 01.06.2018, p. 227-240.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Yuratich, David. / 'The Beast Below' : Doctor Who and the popular negotiation of constitutional values . In: Journal of Popular Television. 2018 ; Vol. 6, No. 2. pp. 227-240.

BibTeX

@article{0cc3a057f1b44cc386ffc0e8c152e11c,
title = "'The Beast Below': Doctor Who and the popular negotiation of constitutional values ",
abstract = "The Doctor{\textquoteright}s adventures frequently see him explore worlds with problems that are not dissimilar to those facing contemporary society. As a result, Doctor Who (1963–89, 1996, 2005–present) often provides and invites political critique. In contrast, relatively little attention has been paid to how the programme provides and invites legal discussion, even though the law is rarely absent from the Doctor{\textquoteright}s adventures. This article seeks to close this gap by examining the constitutional law message contained within the 2010 episode {\textquoteleft}The Beast Below{\textquoteright}. In this episode, the Doctor and Amy Pond must solve a dilemma which involves secretive and state-sponsored torture; this evokes broader constitutional law debates around the roles of law and politics in securing and enforcing human rights. By showing the limits of the Doctor{\textquoteright}s interventions, the episode casts doubt on the appropriateness of the judiciary in establishing the scope of human rights. It endorses a political model of constitutionalism directing that citizens must play an active role in the contestation of executive power, so that constitutional constraints are ultimately negotiated and articulated by the public rather than by elites. By offering this reading, it is hoped that Doctor Who, and science fiction television more widely, can be appreciated as a constitutional text and a forum for constitutional discussion.",
author = "David Yuratich",
year = "2018",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1386/jptv.6.2.227_1",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "227--240",
journal = "Journal of Popular Television",
issn = "2046-9861",
publisher = "Intellect Books",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'The Beast Below'

T2 - Doctor Who and the popular negotiation of constitutional values

AU - Yuratich, David

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - The Doctor’s adventures frequently see him explore worlds with problems that are not dissimilar to those facing contemporary society. As a result, Doctor Who (1963–89, 1996, 2005–present) often provides and invites political critique. In contrast, relatively little attention has been paid to how the programme provides and invites legal discussion, even though the law is rarely absent from the Doctor’s adventures. This article seeks to close this gap by examining the constitutional law message contained within the 2010 episode ‘The Beast Below’. In this episode, the Doctor and Amy Pond must solve a dilemma which involves secretive and state-sponsored torture; this evokes broader constitutional law debates around the roles of law and politics in securing and enforcing human rights. By showing the limits of the Doctor’s interventions, the episode casts doubt on the appropriateness of the judiciary in establishing the scope of human rights. It endorses a political model of constitutionalism directing that citizens must play an active role in the contestation of executive power, so that constitutional constraints are ultimately negotiated and articulated by the public rather than by elites. By offering this reading, it is hoped that Doctor Who, and science fiction television more widely, can be appreciated as a constitutional text and a forum for constitutional discussion.

AB - The Doctor’s adventures frequently see him explore worlds with problems that are not dissimilar to those facing contemporary society. As a result, Doctor Who (1963–89, 1996, 2005–present) often provides and invites political critique. In contrast, relatively little attention has been paid to how the programme provides and invites legal discussion, even though the law is rarely absent from the Doctor’s adventures. This article seeks to close this gap by examining the constitutional law message contained within the 2010 episode ‘The Beast Below’. In this episode, the Doctor and Amy Pond must solve a dilemma which involves secretive and state-sponsored torture; this evokes broader constitutional law debates around the roles of law and politics in securing and enforcing human rights. By showing the limits of the Doctor’s interventions, the episode casts doubt on the appropriateness of the judiciary in establishing the scope of human rights. It endorses a political model of constitutionalism directing that citizens must play an active role in the contestation of executive power, so that constitutional constraints are ultimately negotiated and articulated by the public rather than by elites. By offering this reading, it is hoped that Doctor Who, and science fiction television more widely, can be appreciated as a constitutional text and a forum for constitutional discussion.

U2 - 10.1386/jptv.6.2.227_1

DO - 10.1386/jptv.6.2.227_1

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 227

EP - 240

JO - Journal of Popular Television

JF - Journal of Popular Television

SN - 2046-9861

IS - 2

ER -