Television history : archives, excavation and the future. A discussion. / Smart, William; Wrigley, Amanda.

In: Critical Studies in Television, Vol. 11, No. 1, 01.03.2016, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Published

Standard

Television history : archives, excavation and the future. A discussion. / Smart, William; Wrigley, Amanda.

In: Critical Studies in Television, Vol. 11, No. 1, 01.03.2016, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Smart, W & Wrigley, A 2016, 'Television history: archives, excavation and the future. A discussion', Critical Studies in Television, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749602015618634

APA

Vancouver

Author

Smart, William ; Wrigley, Amanda. / Television history : archives, excavation and the future. A discussion. In: Critical Studies in Television. 2016 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 1-14.

BibTeX

@article{20e9ae0ac9834b1bb00de31b5cec4007,
title = "Television history: archives, excavation and the future. A discussion",
abstract = "This article considers possible futures for television (TV) studies, imagining how the discipline might evolve more productively over the next 10 years and what practical steps are necessary to move towards those outcomes. Conducted as a round-table discussion between leading figures in television history and archives, the debate focuses on the critical issue of archives, considering and responding to questions of access/inaccessibility, texts/contexts, commercial/symbolic value, impact and relevance. These questions reflect recurrent concerns when selecting case studies for historical TV research projects: how difficult is it to access the material (when it survives)? What obstacles might be faced (copyright, costs, etc.) when disseminating findings to a wider public?The relationship between the roles of ‘researcher’ and ‘archivist’ appears closer and more mutually supportive in TV studies than in other academic disciplines, with many people in practice straddling the traditional divide between the two roles, combining specialisms that serve to further scholarship and learning as well as the preservation of, and broad public engagements with, collections. The Research Excellence Framework’s imperative for academic researchers to achieve ‘impact’ in broader society encourages active and creative collaboration with those based in public organizations, such as the British Film Institute (BFI), who have a remit to reach a wider public. The discussion identifies various problems and successes experienced in collaboration between the academic, public and commercial sectors in the course of recent and ongoing research projects in TV studies.",
author = "William Smart and Amanda Wrigley",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1749602015618634",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Critical Studies in Television",
issn = "1749-6020",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Television history

T2 - archives, excavation and the future. A discussion

AU - Smart, William

AU - Wrigley, Amanda

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - This article considers possible futures for television (TV) studies, imagining how the discipline might evolve more productively over the next 10 years and what practical steps are necessary to move towards those outcomes. Conducted as a round-table discussion between leading figures in television history and archives, the debate focuses on the critical issue of archives, considering and responding to questions of access/inaccessibility, texts/contexts, commercial/symbolic value, impact and relevance. These questions reflect recurrent concerns when selecting case studies for historical TV research projects: how difficult is it to access the material (when it survives)? What obstacles might be faced (copyright, costs, etc.) when disseminating findings to a wider public?The relationship between the roles of ‘researcher’ and ‘archivist’ appears closer and more mutually supportive in TV studies than in other academic disciplines, with many people in practice straddling the traditional divide between the two roles, combining specialisms that serve to further scholarship and learning as well as the preservation of, and broad public engagements with, collections. The Research Excellence Framework’s imperative for academic researchers to achieve ‘impact’ in broader society encourages active and creative collaboration with those based in public organizations, such as the British Film Institute (BFI), who have a remit to reach a wider public. The discussion identifies various problems and successes experienced in collaboration between the academic, public and commercial sectors in the course of recent and ongoing research projects in TV studies.

AB - This article considers possible futures for television (TV) studies, imagining how the discipline might evolve more productively over the next 10 years and what practical steps are necessary to move towards those outcomes. Conducted as a round-table discussion between leading figures in television history and archives, the debate focuses on the critical issue of archives, considering and responding to questions of access/inaccessibility, texts/contexts, commercial/symbolic value, impact and relevance. These questions reflect recurrent concerns when selecting case studies for historical TV research projects: how difficult is it to access the material (when it survives)? What obstacles might be faced (copyright, costs, etc.) when disseminating findings to a wider public?The relationship between the roles of ‘researcher’ and ‘archivist’ appears closer and more mutually supportive in TV studies than in other academic disciplines, with many people in practice straddling the traditional divide between the two roles, combining specialisms that serve to further scholarship and learning as well as the preservation of, and broad public engagements with, collections. The Research Excellence Framework’s imperative for academic researchers to achieve ‘impact’ in broader society encourages active and creative collaboration with those based in public organizations, such as the British Film Institute (BFI), who have a remit to reach a wider public. The discussion identifies various problems and successes experienced in collaboration between the academic, public and commercial sectors in the course of recent and ongoing research projects in TV studies.

U2 - 10.1177/1749602015618634

DO - 10.1177/1749602015618634

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Critical Studies in Television

JF - Critical Studies in Television

SN - 1749-6020

IS - 1

ER -