Talking Stagnation : Thematic Analysis of Terrorism Experts’ Perception of the Health of Terrorism Research. / Morrison, John F.

In: Terrorism and Political Violence, 25.08.2020, p. 1-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

E-pub ahead of print

Documents

  • Accepted Manuscript

    Accepted author manuscript, 73.9 KB, Word document

    Embargo ends: 25/02/22

Abstract

In 2014, Marc Sageman proposed that terrorism research had stagnated. The claim of stagnation has resulted in a period of collective review within terrorism studies. To date, the fruits of this review have revealed a more cautiously optimistic view of the field than that proposed by Sageman. This article aims to add to this review by analyzing the interviews of forty-three guests from the first season of the Talking Terror podcast. Presented is a thematic analysis of their views on the overall health of terrorism research. The interviewees included both pre-and post-9/11 researchers. Through this analysis four themes are identified: Interdisciplinary Research and Researchers, Data, Applied Research, and Area/Field. The majority of inter- viewees were more optimistic than Sageman in relation to the overall health of the area. Analysis of their responses is presented alongside some recom- mendations for the future direction of the area.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalTerrorism and Political Violence
Early online date25 Aug 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 25 Aug 2020
This open access research output is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

ID: 38887802