Standing for Parliament : Do Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic Candidates Pay Extra? / Stegmaier, Mary; Lewis-Beck, Michael S.; Smets, Kaat.

In: Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 66, No. 2, 2013, p. 268-285.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Standing for Parliament : Do Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic Candidates Pay Extra? / Stegmaier, Mary; Lewis-Beck, Michael S.; Smets, Kaat.

In: Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 66, No. 2, 2013, p. 268-285.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Stegmaier, M, Lewis-Beck, MS & Smets, K 2013, 'Standing for Parliament: Do Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic Candidates Pay Extra?', Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 268-285. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss086

APA

Vancouver

Author

Stegmaier, Mary ; Lewis-Beck, Michael S. ; Smets, Kaat. / Standing for Parliament : Do Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic Candidates Pay Extra?. In: Parliamentary Affairs. 2013 ; Vol. 66, No. 2. pp. 268-285.

BibTeX

@article{a9af240537dc4d4dae5ae443740c26cf,
title = "Standing for Parliament: Do Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic Candidates Pay Extra?",
abstract = "Western democracies, with their increasingly diverse racial and ethnic popula- tions, are seeing more political candidates who are non-white. How do these non-white candidates fare at the ballot box? Does their non-white status mean they gain or lose votes? Do their challengers gain or lose votes? In recent work on the US case, it appears that candidate Obama lost votes in 2008 because of his non-white status. The research question we address here is whether, in the context of the 2010 UK parliamentary elections, the race or ethnicity of the can- didates played a role in the vote totals. What we find is that, while in some ways race does not matter, in other ways it does. In particular, it appears that the local incumbent party in a constituency typically gained at least two percentage points in vote share (of the major-three-party vote), when they had a Black, Asian or Minority Ethnic (BAME) challenger. Of course, this does not mean that BAME can- didates cannot win. It has been amply demonstrated that they can win. But what it does mean is that, other things being equal, the local party (which won the seat last time) is likely to benefit from their presence in the contest.",
keywords = "Vote choice, Race candidate",
author = "Mary Stegmaier and Lewis-Beck, {Michael S.} and Kaat Smets",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1093/pa/gss086",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "268--285",
journal = "Parliamentary Affairs",
issn = "0031-2290",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Standing for Parliament

T2 - Do Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic Candidates Pay Extra?

AU - Stegmaier, Mary

AU - Lewis-Beck, Michael S.

AU - Smets, Kaat

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Western democracies, with their increasingly diverse racial and ethnic popula- tions, are seeing more political candidates who are non-white. How do these non-white candidates fare at the ballot box? Does their non-white status mean they gain or lose votes? Do their challengers gain or lose votes? In recent work on the US case, it appears that candidate Obama lost votes in 2008 because of his non-white status. The research question we address here is whether, in the context of the 2010 UK parliamentary elections, the race or ethnicity of the can- didates played a role in the vote totals. What we find is that, while in some ways race does not matter, in other ways it does. In particular, it appears that the local incumbent party in a constituency typically gained at least two percentage points in vote share (of the major-three-party vote), when they had a Black, Asian or Minority Ethnic (BAME) challenger. Of course, this does not mean that BAME can- didates cannot win. It has been amply demonstrated that they can win. But what it does mean is that, other things being equal, the local party (which won the seat last time) is likely to benefit from their presence in the contest.

AB - Western democracies, with their increasingly diverse racial and ethnic popula- tions, are seeing more political candidates who are non-white. How do these non-white candidates fare at the ballot box? Does their non-white status mean they gain or lose votes? Do their challengers gain or lose votes? In recent work on the US case, it appears that candidate Obama lost votes in 2008 because of his non-white status. The research question we address here is whether, in the context of the 2010 UK parliamentary elections, the race or ethnicity of the can- didates played a role in the vote totals. What we find is that, while in some ways race does not matter, in other ways it does. In particular, it appears that the local incumbent party in a constituency typically gained at least two percentage points in vote share (of the major-three-party vote), when they had a Black, Asian or Minority Ethnic (BAME) challenger. Of course, this does not mean that BAME can- didates cannot win. It has been amply demonstrated that they can win. But what it does mean is that, other things being equal, the local party (which won the seat last time) is likely to benefit from their presence in the contest.

KW - Vote choice

KW - Race candidate

U2 - 10.1093/pa/gss086

DO - 10.1093/pa/gss086

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 268

EP - 285

JO - Parliamentary Affairs

JF - Parliamentary Affairs

SN - 0031-2290

IS - 2

ER -