Social Media, Professional Media, and Mobilization in Contemporary Britain : Explaining the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Citizens’ Movement 38 Degrees. / Chadwick, Andrew; Dennis, James.

In: Political Studies, Vol. 65, No. 1, 01.03.2017, p. 42-60.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Published

Standard

Social Media, Professional Media, and Mobilization in Contemporary Britain : Explaining the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Citizens’ Movement 38 Degrees. / Chadwick, Andrew; Dennis, James.

In: Political Studies, Vol. 65, No. 1, 01.03.2017, p. 42-60.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{8564423a0c754fe8b8bc4800eaae1caf,
title = "Social Media, Professional Media, and Mobilization in Contemporary Britain: Explaining the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Citizens’ Movement 38 Degrees",
abstract = "Digital media continue to reshape political activism in unexpected ways. Within a period of a few years, the internet-enabled UK citizens’ movement 38 Degrees has amassed a membership of 3 million and now sits alongside similar entities such as America’s MoveOn, Australia’s GetUp!, and the transnational movement Avaaz. In this article, we contribute to current thinking about digital media and mobilization by addressing some of the limitations of existing research on these movements and on digital activism more generally. We show how 38 Degrees’ digital network repertoires coexist interdependently with its strategy of gaining professional news media coverage. We explain how the oscillations between choreographic leadership and member influence, and between digital media horizontalism and elite media-centric work constitutes the space of interdependencies in which 38 Degrees acts. These delicately balanced relations can quickly dissolve and be replaced by simpler relations of dependence on professional media. Yet despite its fragility, we theorize about how 38 Degrees may boost individuals’ political efficacy, irrespective of the outcome of individual campaigns. Our conceptual framework can be used to guide research on similar movements.",
author = "Andrew Chadwick and James Dennis",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0032321716631350",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "42--60",
journal = "Political Studies",
issn = "0032-3217",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social Media, Professional Media, and Mobilization in Contemporary Britain

T2 - Explaining the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Citizens’ Movement 38 Degrees

AU - Chadwick, Andrew

AU - Dennis, James

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Digital media continue to reshape political activism in unexpected ways. Within a period of a few years, the internet-enabled UK citizens’ movement 38 Degrees has amassed a membership of 3 million and now sits alongside similar entities such as America’s MoveOn, Australia’s GetUp!, and the transnational movement Avaaz. In this article, we contribute to current thinking about digital media and mobilization by addressing some of the limitations of existing research on these movements and on digital activism more generally. We show how 38 Degrees’ digital network repertoires coexist interdependently with its strategy of gaining professional news media coverage. We explain how the oscillations between choreographic leadership and member influence, and between digital media horizontalism and elite media-centric work constitutes the space of interdependencies in which 38 Degrees acts. These delicately balanced relations can quickly dissolve and be replaced by simpler relations of dependence on professional media. Yet despite its fragility, we theorize about how 38 Degrees may boost individuals’ political efficacy, irrespective of the outcome of individual campaigns. Our conceptual framework can be used to guide research on similar movements.

AB - Digital media continue to reshape political activism in unexpected ways. Within a period of a few years, the internet-enabled UK citizens’ movement 38 Degrees has amassed a membership of 3 million and now sits alongside similar entities such as America’s MoveOn, Australia’s GetUp!, and the transnational movement Avaaz. In this article, we contribute to current thinking about digital media and mobilization by addressing some of the limitations of existing research on these movements and on digital activism more generally. We show how 38 Degrees’ digital network repertoires coexist interdependently with its strategy of gaining professional news media coverage. We explain how the oscillations between choreographic leadership and member influence, and between digital media horizontalism and elite media-centric work constitutes the space of interdependencies in which 38 Degrees acts. These delicately balanced relations can quickly dissolve and be replaced by simpler relations of dependence on professional media. Yet despite its fragility, we theorize about how 38 Degrees may boost individuals’ political efficacy, irrespective of the outcome of individual campaigns. Our conceptual framework can be used to guide research on similar movements.

U2 - 10.1177/0032321716631350

DO - 10.1177/0032321716631350

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 42

EP - 60

JO - Political Studies

JF - Political Studies

SN - 0032-3217

IS - 1

ER -