‘[P]rophane fidlers’ : Medical Paratexts and Indecent Readers in Early Modern England. / Newman, Harry.

Medical Paratexts from Medieval to Modern: Dissecting the Page. ed. / Diane Scott; Hannah Tweed. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., 2018. p. 15-41 (Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

Published

Standard

‘[P]rophane fidlers’ : Medical Paratexts and Indecent Readers in Early Modern England. / Newman, Harry.

Medical Paratexts from Medieval to Modern: Dissecting the Page. ed. / Diane Scott; Hannah Tweed. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., 2018. p. 15-41 (Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

Harvard

Newman, H 2018, ‘[P]rophane fidlers’: Medical Paratexts and Indecent Readers in Early Modern England. in D Scott & H Tweed (eds), Medical Paratexts from Medieval to Modern: Dissecting the Page. Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine, Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., pp. 15-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73426-2_2

APA

Newman, H. (2018). ‘[P]rophane fidlers’: Medical Paratexts and Indecent Readers in Early Modern England. In D. Scott, & H. Tweed (Eds.), Medical Paratexts from Medieval to Modern: Dissecting the Page (pp. 15-41). (Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine). Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73426-2_2

Vancouver

Newman H. ‘[P]rophane fidlers’: Medical Paratexts and Indecent Readers in Early Modern England. In Scott D, Tweed H, editors, Medical Paratexts from Medieval to Modern: Dissecting the Page. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. 2018. p. 15-41. (Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73426-2_2

Author

Newman, Harry. / ‘[P]rophane fidlers’ : Medical Paratexts and Indecent Readers in Early Modern England. Medical Paratexts from Medieval to Modern: Dissecting the Page. editor / Diane Scott ; Hannah Tweed. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., 2018. pp. 15-41 (Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine).

BibTeX

@inbook{934c2580892a47fa9c9aa29c0f09632c,
title = "‘[P]rophane fidlers’: Medical Paratexts and Indecent Readers in Early Modern England",
abstract = "The sixteenth and seventeenth centuries saw an enormous proliferation of printed vernacular texts that discussed and illustrated the female reproductive organs. These gynaecological and obstetrical texts, which included midwifery manuals as well as sections in large anatomical works, inflamed moral outrage (even within the medical establishment) and were stigmatized as forms of pornography. While literary, social and medical historians have addressed the relationship between medical and erotic literature in the early modern period, little has been written on the significance of book history to such discussions. In particular, paratexts (not only title-pages, dedications and prefaces, but also readers’ annotations) can tell us much about the connections between the rhetorical or ‘literary’ qualities of these books and their material life during publication and reading processes.Focusing on Helkiah Crooke’s anatomical work Mikrokosmographia; or a Description of the Body of Man (1615, 1616, 1618, 1631, 1651) and its ‘portable’ octavo epitome Somatographia Anthropine (1616, 1634) as a case study, this article combines archival work with analysis of rhetoric and illustrations to examine the ways in which paratexts negotiated anxieties attendant upon publishing women’s ‘secrets’ in early modern England. I consider how prefatory writers – not just authors but also translators and publishers – justified the publications to ‘legitimate readers’ (modest women and medical professionals) and admonished the intrusiveness of ‘illegitimate readers’ (laymen). These writers employed rhetorical strategies which, while explicitly establishing the publications’ legitimacy, fetishized the books as marketable erotic objects, making them more attractive to consumers driven by prurient curiosity. Through bibliographical analysis of a wide range of copies based in the UK, the USA and Canada, I draw comparisons between the implied readers constructed by medical paratexts and the actual readers (both male and female) who produced their own.",
author = "Harry Newman",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-73426-2_2",
language = "English",
series = "Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
pages = "15--41",
editor = "Diane Scott and Hannah Tweed",
booktitle = "Medical Paratexts from Medieval to Modern",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - ‘[P]rophane fidlers’

T2 - Medical Paratexts and Indecent Readers in Early Modern England

AU - Newman, Harry

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The sixteenth and seventeenth centuries saw an enormous proliferation of printed vernacular texts that discussed and illustrated the female reproductive organs. These gynaecological and obstetrical texts, which included midwifery manuals as well as sections in large anatomical works, inflamed moral outrage (even within the medical establishment) and were stigmatized as forms of pornography. While literary, social and medical historians have addressed the relationship between medical and erotic literature in the early modern period, little has been written on the significance of book history to such discussions. In particular, paratexts (not only title-pages, dedications and prefaces, but also readers’ annotations) can tell us much about the connections between the rhetorical or ‘literary’ qualities of these books and their material life during publication and reading processes.Focusing on Helkiah Crooke’s anatomical work Mikrokosmographia; or a Description of the Body of Man (1615, 1616, 1618, 1631, 1651) and its ‘portable’ octavo epitome Somatographia Anthropine (1616, 1634) as a case study, this article combines archival work with analysis of rhetoric and illustrations to examine the ways in which paratexts negotiated anxieties attendant upon publishing women’s ‘secrets’ in early modern England. I consider how prefatory writers – not just authors but also translators and publishers – justified the publications to ‘legitimate readers’ (modest women and medical professionals) and admonished the intrusiveness of ‘illegitimate readers’ (laymen). These writers employed rhetorical strategies which, while explicitly establishing the publications’ legitimacy, fetishized the books as marketable erotic objects, making them more attractive to consumers driven by prurient curiosity. Through bibliographical analysis of a wide range of copies based in the UK, the USA and Canada, I draw comparisons between the implied readers constructed by medical paratexts and the actual readers (both male and female) who produced their own.

AB - The sixteenth and seventeenth centuries saw an enormous proliferation of printed vernacular texts that discussed and illustrated the female reproductive organs. These gynaecological and obstetrical texts, which included midwifery manuals as well as sections in large anatomical works, inflamed moral outrage (even within the medical establishment) and were stigmatized as forms of pornography. While literary, social and medical historians have addressed the relationship between medical and erotic literature in the early modern period, little has been written on the significance of book history to such discussions. In particular, paratexts (not only title-pages, dedications and prefaces, but also readers’ annotations) can tell us much about the connections between the rhetorical or ‘literary’ qualities of these books and their material life during publication and reading processes.Focusing on Helkiah Crooke’s anatomical work Mikrokosmographia; or a Description of the Body of Man (1615, 1616, 1618, 1631, 1651) and its ‘portable’ octavo epitome Somatographia Anthropine (1616, 1634) as a case study, this article combines archival work with analysis of rhetoric and illustrations to examine the ways in which paratexts negotiated anxieties attendant upon publishing women’s ‘secrets’ in early modern England. I consider how prefatory writers – not just authors but also translators and publishers – justified the publications to ‘legitimate readers’ (modest women and medical professionals) and admonished the intrusiveness of ‘illegitimate readers’ (laymen). These writers employed rhetorical strategies which, while explicitly establishing the publications’ legitimacy, fetishized the books as marketable erotic objects, making them more attractive to consumers driven by prurient curiosity. Through bibliographical analysis of a wide range of copies based in the UK, the USA and Canada, I draw comparisons between the implied readers constructed by medical paratexts and the actual readers (both male and female) who produced their own.

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-73426-2_2

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-73426-2_2

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

T3 - Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine

SP - 15

EP - 41

BT - Medical Paratexts from Medieval to Modern

A2 - Scott, Diane

A2 - Tweed, Hannah

PB - Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.

ER -