Politics is sublime. / Dikeç, Mustafa.

In: Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2012, p. 262-279.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Politics is sublime. / Dikeç, Mustafa.

In: Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2012, p. 262-279.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Dikeç, M 2012, 'Politics is sublime', Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 262-279. https://doi.org/10.1068/d12610

APA

Dikeç, M. (2012). Politics is sublime. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30(2), 262-279. https://doi.org/10.1068/d12610

Vancouver

Dikeç M. Politics is sublime. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2012;30(2):262-279. https://doi.org/10.1068/d12610

Author

Dikeç, Mustafa. / Politics is sublime. In: Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2012 ; Vol. 30, No. 2. pp. 262-279.

BibTeX

@article{ac2d8bb5b0884af5a789e441ba715bd5,
title = "Politics is sublime",
abstract = "This paper examines the political aesthetic of Hannah Arendt and Jacques Ranci{\`e}re who, in their own ways, found resources in an innovative reading of Kant{\textquoteright}s Critique of Judgement. The paper explores the Kantian legacy in the political understanding of these two thinkers. It then focuses on Ranci{\`e}re{\textquoteright}s notion of dissensus, and argues that his politics shares the aesthetic features associated with the Kantian sublime.",
author = "Mustafa Dike{\c c}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1068/d12610",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "262--279",
journal = "Environment and Planning D: Society and Space",
issn = "0263-7758",
publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Politics is sublime

AU - Dikeç, Mustafa

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - This paper examines the political aesthetic of Hannah Arendt and Jacques Rancière who, in their own ways, found resources in an innovative reading of Kant’s Critique of Judgement. The paper explores the Kantian legacy in the political understanding of these two thinkers. It then focuses on Rancière’s notion of dissensus, and argues that his politics shares the aesthetic features associated with the Kantian sublime.

AB - This paper examines the political aesthetic of Hannah Arendt and Jacques Rancière who, in their own ways, found resources in an innovative reading of Kant’s Critique of Judgement. The paper explores the Kantian legacy in the political understanding of these two thinkers. It then focuses on Rancière’s notion of dissensus, and argues that his politics shares the aesthetic features associated with the Kantian sublime.

U2 - 10.1068/d12610

DO - 10.1068/d12610

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 262

EP - 279

JO - Environment and Planning D: Society and Space

JF - Environment and Planning D: Society and Space

SN - 0263-7758

IS - 2

ER -