Meta-analysis of the role of entomopathogenic and unspecialized fungal endophytes as plant bodyguards. / Gange, Alan; Koricheva, Julia; Currie, Amanda; Jaber, Lara; Vidal, Stefan.

In: New Phytologist, 19.04.2019, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

Meta-analysis of the role of entomopathogenic and unspecialized fungal endophytes as plant bodyguards. / Gange, Alan; Koricheva, Julia; Currie, Amanda; Jaber, Lara; Vidal, Stefan.

In: New Phytologist, 19.04.2019, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{742f61f25387431e83bb47fb57704b25,
title = "Meta-analysis of the role of entomopathogenic and unspecialized fungal endophytes as plant bodyguards",
abstract = "Herbaceous plants harbour species-rich communities of asymptomatic endophytic fungi. Although some of these endophytes are entomopathogenic, many are not, and remarkably little is known about how the presence of these fungi in plant tissues affects phytophagous insects. Here we show through a meta-analysis that both entomopathogenic and nonentomopathogenic endophytes have a negative effect on insect herbivores. Growth and performance of polyphagous and sucking insects are reduced by nonentomopathogenic endophytes, but monophages are unaffected, likely because the latter are better adapted to secondary metabolites produced or induced by the fungi. Furthermore, studies using excised leaves report weaker effects than those with intact plants, likely caused by chemical changes being masked by leaf excision. Most surprisingly, endophyte infection of seeds produces the greatest effect on insect herbivores in subsequent mature plants, even though the usual mode of fungal transmission is infection of leaves by airborne spores. We conclude that these ubiquitous hidden fungi may be important bodyguards of plants. However, in order to fully understand their roles in plant protection, we must be aware that minor differences in experimental design can lead to contradictory results.",
keywords = "Entomopathogen, systemic growth, seeds, insect herbivore, inoculation, effect size, defence",
author = "Alan Gange and Julia Koricheva and Amanda Currie and Lara Jaber and Stefan Vidal",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1111/nph.15859",
language = "English",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "New Phytologist",
issn = "0028-646X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meta-analysis of the role of entomopathogenic and unspecialized fungal endophytes as plant bodyguards

AU - Gange, Alan

AU - Koricheva, Julia

AU - Currie, Amanda

AU - Jaber, Lara

AU - Vidal, Stefan

PY - 2019/4/19

Y1 - 2019/4/19

N2 - Herbaceous plants harbour species-rich communities of asymptomatic endophytic fungi. Although some of these endophytes are entomopathogenic, many are not, and remarkably little is known about how the presence of these fungi in plant tissues affects phytophagous insects. Here we show through a meta-analysis that both entomopathogenic and nonentomopathogenic endophytes have a negative effect on insect herbivores. Growth and performance of polyphagous and sucking insects are reduced by nonentomopathogenic endophytes, but monophages are unaffected, likely because the latter are better adapted to secondary metabolites produced or induced by the fungi. Furthermore, studies using excised leaves report weaker effects than those with intact plants, likely caused by chemical changes being masked by leaf excision. Most surprisingly, endophyte infection of seeds produces the greatest effect on insect herbivores in subsequent mature plants, even though the usual mode of fungal transmission is infection of leaves by airborne spores. We conclude that these ubiquitous hidden fungi may be important bodyguards of plants. However, in order to fully understand their roles in plant protection, we must be aware that minor differences in experimental design can lead to contradictory results.

AB - Herbaceous plants harbour species-rich communities of asymptomatic endophytic fungi. Although some of these endophytes are entomopathogenic, many are not, and remarkably little is known about how the presence of these fungi in plant tissues affects phytophagous insects. Here we show through a meta-analysis that both entomopathogenic and nonentomopathogenic endophytes have a negative effect on insect herbivores. Growth and performance of polyphagous and sucking insects are reduced by nonentomopathogenic endophytes, but monophages are unaffected, likely because the latter are better adapted to secondary metabolites produced or induced by the fungi. Furthermore, studies using excised leaves report weaker effects than those with intact plants, likely caused by chemical changes being masked by leaf excision. Most surprisingly, endophyte infection of seeds produces the greatest effect on insect herbivores in subsequent mature plants, even though the usual mode of fungal transmission is infection of leaves by airborne spores. We conclude that these ubiquitous hidden fungi may be important bodyguards of plants. However, in order to fully understand their roles in plant protection, we must be aware that minor differences in experimental design can lead to contradictory results.

KW - Entomopathogen

KW - systemic growth

KW - seeds

KW - insect herbivore

KW - inoculation

KW - effect size

KW - defence

U2 - 10.1111/nph.15859

DO - 10.1111/nph.15859

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - New Phytologist

JF - New Phytologist

SN - 0028-646X

ER -