Meta-analysis of the role of entomopathogenic and unspecialised fungal endophytes as plant bodyguards. / Gange, Alan; Koricheva, Julia; Currie, Amanda; Jaber, Lara; Vidal, Stefan.

In: New Phytologist, 12.04.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle



  • Accepted Manuscript

    Accepted author manuscript, 312 KB, Word-document


•Herbaceous plants harbour species-rich communities of asymptomatic endophytic fungi. While some of these endophytes are entomopathogenic, many are not, and remarkably little is known about how the presence of these fungi in plant tissues affects phytophagous insects.
•Here we show through a meta-analysis that both entomopathogenic and non-entomopathogenic endophytes have a negative effect on insect herbivores. Growth and performance of polyphagous and sucking insects are reduced by non-entomopathogenic endophytes, but monophages are unaffected, likely because the latter are better adapted to secondary metabolites produced or induced by the fungi.
•Furthermore, studies using excised leaves report weaker effects than those with intact plants, likely caused by chemical changes being masked by leaf excision. Most surprisingly, endophyte infection of seeds produces the greatest effect on insect herbivores in subsequent mature plants, even though the usual mode of fungal transmission is infection of leaves by air-borne spores.
•We conclude that these ubiquitous hidden fungi may be important bodyguards of plants. However, in order to fully understand their roles in plant protection, we must be aware that minor differences in experimental design can lead to contradictory results.
Original languageEnglish
JournalNew Phytologist
StateAccepted/In press - 12 Apr 2019

ID: 33677081