Locating Relevance in Security Studies. / Sjoberg, Laura.

In: Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 13, No. 2, 18.06.2015, p. 396-398.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Published

Standard

Locating Relevance in Security Studies. / Sjoberg, Laura.

In: Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 13, No. 2, 18.06.2015, p. 396-398.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Sjoberg, L 2015, 'Locating Relevance in Security Studies', Perspectives on Politics, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 396-398. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592715000171

APA

Vancouver

Author

Sjoberg, Laura. / Locating Relevance in Security Studies. In: Perspectives on Politics. 2015 ; Vol. 13, No. 2. pp. 396-398.

BibTeX

@article{5751bfdd33c045acafc782d8a5ffea40,
title = "Locating Relevance in Security Studies",
abstract = "Michael Desch argues that the increasing sophistication of quantitative methodology deployed by those who study war and conflict in global politics ({\textquoteleft}Security Studies{\textquoteright}) trades off with the relevance of work in the subfield to the {\textquoteleft}real world{\textquoteright} (the Washington Beltway), which is normatively and substantively problematic. I generally agree with Desch that Security Studies has a relevance problem attributable to its current epistemological and methodological framings. However, I think Desch specifies both the target of relevance and the scope of Security Studies{\textquoteright} methodological issues in ways that obscure the degree to which his own analytical framework is actually part of the problem rather than an effective critique of it.",
keywords = "relevance, security studies, methodology",
author = "Laura Sjoberg",
year = "2015",
month = jun,
day = "18",
doi = "10.1017/S1537592715000171",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "396--398",
journal = "Perspectives on Politics",
issn = "1537-5927",
publisher = "CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Locating Relevance in Security Studies

AU - Sjoberg, Laura

PY - 2015/6/18

Y1 - 2015/6/18

N2 - Michael Desch argues that the increasing sophistication of quantitative methodology deployed by those who study war and conflict in global politics (‘Security Studies’) trades off with the relevance of work in the subfield to the ‘real world’ (the Washington Beltway), which is normatively and substantively problematic. I generally agree with Desch that Security Studies has a relevance problem attributable to its current epistemological and methodological framings. However, I think Desch specifies both the target of relevance and the scope of Security Studies’ methodological issues in ways that obscure the degree to which his own analytical framework is actually part of the problem rather than an effective critique of it.

AB - Michael Desch argues that the increasing sophistication of quantitative methodology deployed by those who study war and conflict in global politics (‘Security Studies’) trades off with the relevance of work in the subfield to the ‘real world’ (the Washington Beltway), which is normatively and substantively problematic. I generally agree with Desch that Security Studies has a relevance problem attributable to its current epistemological and methodological framings. However, I think Desch specifies both the target of relevance and the scope of Security Studies’ methodological issues in ways that obscure the degree to which his own analytical framework is actually part of the problem rather than an effective critique of it.

KW - relevance

KW - security studies

KW - methodology

U2 - 10.1017/S1537592715000171

DO - 10.1017/S1537592715000171

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 396

EP - 398

JO - Perspectives on Politics

JF - Perspectives on Politics

SN - 1537-5927

IS - 2

ER -