Living with Hollywood : British film policy and the definition of ‘nationality’. / Hill, John.

In: International Journal of Cultural Policy, Vol. 22, No. 5, 17.10.2016, p. 706-723.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

Living with Hollywood : British film policy and the definition of ‘nationality’. / Hill, John.

In: International Journal of Cultural Policy, Vol. 22, No. 5, 17.10.2016, p. 706-723.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Hill, John. / Living with Hollywood : British film policy and the definition of ‘nationality’. In: International Journal of Cultural Policy. 2016 ; Vol. 22, No. 5. pp. 706-723.

BibTeX

@article{c03a9c9bbb324a838419a917924dfa9c,
title = "Living with Hollywood: British film policy and the definition of {\textquoteleft}nationality{\textquoteright}",
abstract = "Focusing upon how a {\textquoteleft}national{\textquoteright} film has been historically defined in Britain, this article traces the history of legal definitions of a {\textquoteleft}British{\textquoteright} film and identifies some of the issues around nationality that these have raised. The article begins with a discussion of the introduction of quotas for {\textquoteleft}British{\textquoteright} films in the 1920s and the adoption of the Eady levy as a means of providing production finance to {\textquoteleft}British{\textquoteright} films in the post-war period. It then goes on to examine the introduction, in response to EU regulations governing the film industry, of a {\textquoteleft}Cultural Test{\textquoteright} for {\textquoteleft}British film{\textquoteright} in 2007 and to consider the way in which eligibility for tax reliefs has depended upon a film qualifying as {\textquoteleft}British{\textquoteright}. In assessing whether the Cultural Test may be regarded as constituting a {\textquoteleft}break{\textquoteright} in British film policy in terms of a shift from economic to cultural objectives, the article not only indicates the manner in which cultural and economic objectives have been brought into alignment but also identifies how the definition of the {\textquoteleft}national{\textquoteright} for the purposes of tax relief has been designed to encourage {\textquoteleft}transnational{\textquoteright} Hollywood production within the UK. In doing so, the article also indicates how {\textquoteleft}national{\textquoteright} discourses and practices have continued to inform and structure the economic and cultural dynamics of contemporary {\textquoteleft}British{\textquoteright} cinema as well as engaging with, rather than necessarily standing in opposition to, {\textquoteleft}transnational{\textquoteright} and globalising trends.",
keywords = "Britain, European Union, Film Policy, British film, National Cinema, Transnational cinema , Tax policy, Cultural Test, Hollywood",
author = "John Hill",
year = "2016",
month = oct,
day = "17",
doi = "10.1080/10286632.2016.1223646",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "706--723",
journal = "International Journal of Cultural Policy",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Living with Hollywood

T2 - British film policy and the definition of ‘nationality’

AU - Hill, John

PY - 2016/10/17

Y1 - 2016/10/17

N2 - Focusing upon how a ‘national’ film has been historically defined in Britain, this article traces the history of legal definitions of a ‘British’ film and identifies some of the issues around nationality that these have raised. The article begins with a discussion of the introduction of quotas for ‘British’ films in the 1920s and the adoption of the Eady levy as a means of providing production finance to ‘British’ films in the post-war period. It then goes on to examine the introduction, in response to EU regulations governing the film industry, of a ‘Cultural Test’ for ‘British film’ in 2007 and to consider the way in which eligibility for tax reliefs has depended upon a film qualifying as ‘British’. In assessing whether the Cultural Test may be regarded as constituting a ‘break’ in British film policy in terms of a shift from economic to cultural objectives, the article not only indicates the manner in which cultural and economic objectives have been brought into alignment but also identifies how the definition of the ‘national’ for the purposes of tax relief has been designed to encourage ‘transnational’ Hollywood production within the UK. In doing so, the article also indicates how ‘national’ discourses and practices have continued to inform and structure the economic and cultural dynamics of contemporary ‘British’ cinema as well as engaging with, rather than necessarily standing in opposition to, ‘transnational’ and globalising trends.

AB - Focusing upon how a ‘national’ film has been historically defined in Britain, this article traces the history of legal definitions of a ‘British’ film and identifies some of the issues around nationality that these have raised. The article begins with a discussion of the introduction of quotas for ‘British’ films in the 1920s and the adoption of the Eady levy as a means of providing production finance to ‘British’ films in the post-war period. It then goes on to examine the introduction, in response to EU regulations governing the film industry, of a ‘Cultural Test’ for ‘British film’ in 2007 and to consider the way in which eligibility for tax reliefs has depended upon a film qualifying as ‘British’. In assessing whether the Cultural Test may be regarded as constituting a ‘break’ in British film policy in terms of a shift from economic to cultural objectives, the article not only indicates the manner in which cultural and economic objectives have been brought into alignment but also identifies how the definition of the ‘national’ for the purposes of tax relief has been designed to encourage ‘transnational’ Hollywood production within the UK. In doing so, the article also indicates how ‘national’ discourses and practices have continued to inform and structure the economic and cultural dynamics of contemporary ‘British’ cinema as well as engaging with, rather than necessarily standing in opposition to, ‘transnational’ and globalising trends.

KW - Britain

KW - European Union

KW - Film Policy

KW - British film

KW - National Cinema

KW - Transnational cinema

KW - Tax policy

KW - Cultural Test

KW - Hollywood

U2 - 10.1080/10286632.2016.1223646

DO - 10.1080/10286632.2016.1223646

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 706

EP - 723

JO - International Journal of Cultural Policy

JF - International Journal of Cultural Policy

IS - 5

ER -