Judging politicians : The role of political attentiveness in shaping how people evaluate the ethical behaviour of their leaders. / Birch, Sarah; Allen, Nicholas.

In: European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 54, No. 1, 02.2015, p. 43-60.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Judging politicians : The role of political attentiveness in shaping how people evaluate the ethical behaviour of their leaders. / Birch, Sarah; Allen, Nicholas.

In: European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 54, No. 1, 02.2015, p. 43-60.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{ede6426f4d9b478cb8497cd534039e54,
title = "Judging politicians: The role of political attentiveness in shaping how people evaluate the ethical behaviour of their leaders",
abstract = "Political theorists have developed well-defined normative understandings of what constitutes ethical political conduct. Based on democratic theory as well as the demands of practical politics, these understandings prescribe certain types of behaviour and proscribe other types. However, it is unclear to what extent this normative framework has resonance for ordinary citizens. This article demonstrates that attention to politics tends to increase the resonance of this normative framework. The analysis identifies three norms about the holding of public office that are expected to structure citizens' ethical judgments: the avoidance of conflicts of interest; conformity with the law or institutional rules; and the maximisation of the public good. The article assesses the importance of these norms in structuring judgments by means of an experiment embedded in a population survey conducted in Great Britain. The analysis finds that informational cues pertaining to conflict-of-interest avoidance only condition responses among the attentive, while information pertaining to law conformity has far wider resonance. This finding has implications for approaches to political ethics focusing on normative considerations that appear to have low salience for much of the general public.",
author = "Sarah Birch and Nicholas Allen",
year = "2015",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1111/1475-6765.12066",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "43--60",
journal = "European Journal of Political Research",
issn = "0304-4130",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Judging politicians

T2 - The role of political attentiveness in shaping how people evaluate the ethical behaviour of their leaders

AU - Birch, Sarah

AU - Allen, Nicholas

PY - 2015/2

Y1 - 2015/2

N2 - Political theorists have developed well-defined normative understandings of what constitutes ethical political conduct. Based on democratic theory as well as the demands of practical politics, these understandings prescribe certain types of behaviour and proscribe other types. However, it is unclear to what extent this normative framework has resonance for ordinary citizens. This article demonstrates that attention to politics tends to increase the resonance of this normative framework. The analysis identifies three norms about the holding of public office that are expected to structure citizens' ethical judgments: the avoidance of conflicts of interest; conformity with the law or institutional rules; and the maximisation of the public good. The article assesses the importance of these norms in structuring judgments by means of an experiment embedded in a population survey conducted in Great Britain. The analysis finds that informational cues pertaining to conflict-of-interest avoidance only condition responses among the attentive, while information pertaining to law conformity has far wider resonance. This finding has implications for approaches to political ethics focusing on normative considerations that appear to have low salience for much of the general public.

AB - Political theorists have developed well-defined normative understandings of what constitutes ethical political conduct. Based on democratic theory as well as the demands of practical politics, these understandings prescribe certain types of behaviour and proscribe other types. However, it is unclear to what extent this normative framework has resonance for ordinary citizens. This article demonstrates that attention to politics tends to increase the resonance of this normative framework. The analysis identifies three norms about the holding of public office that are expected to structure citizens' ethical judgments: the avoidance of conflicts of interest; conformity with the law or institutional rules; and the maximisation of the public good. The article assesses the importance of these norms in structuring judgments by means of an experiment embedded in a population survey conducted in Great Britain. The analysis finds that informational cues pertaining to conflict-of-interest avoidance only condition responses among the attentive, while information pertaining to law conformity has far wider resonance. This finding has implications for approaches to political ethics focusing on normative considerations that appear to have low salience for much of the general public.

U2 - 10.1111/1475-6765.12066

DO - 10.1111/1475-6765.12066

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 43

EP - 60

JO - European Journal of Political Research

JF - European Journal of Political Research

SN - 0304-4130

IS - 1

ER -