Intimacy, Warfare, and Gender Hierarchy. / Sjoberg, Laura.

In: Political Geography, Vol. 44, 01.2015, p. 74-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Intimacy, Warfare, and Gender Hierarchy. / Sjoberg, Laura.

In: Political Geography, Vol. 44, 01.2015, p. 74-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Sjoberg, Laura. / Intimacy, Warfare, and Gender Hierarchy. In: Political Geography. 2015 ; Vol. 44. pp. 74-76.

BibTeX

@article{f04556d40bf94016804ddd64a50a24f1,
title = "Intimacy, Warfare, and Gender Hierarchy",
abstract = "It is in the spirit of engagement that I read Pain{\textquoteright}s paper with an eye toward the ways in which our thinking about gender, war, and experience overlap, and can contribute to each other. In so doing, I see three current trends in feminist work in IR which might productively dialogue with Pain{\textquoteright}s approach, and serve to advance both understandings in potentially interesting and important ways. I use a particular recent work in my field to engage Pain{\textquoteright}s analysis in each of three areas: the political economies of intimate war, understanding the body as a space of warfare, and theorizing gender hierarchy in the analysis of intimate war.",
keywords = "gender, intimacy, warfare, feminist theorizing, feminist IR, feminist security, security studies",
author = "Laura Sjoberg",
year = "2015",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.09.008",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "74--76",
journal = "Political Geography",
issn = "0962-6298",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intimacy, Warfare, and Gender Hierarchy

AU - Sjoberg, Laura

PY - 2015/1

Y1 - 2015/1

N2 - It is in the spirit of engagement that I read Pain’s paper with an eye toward the ways in which our thinking about gender, war, and experience overlap, and can contribute to each other. In so doing, I see three current trends in feminist work in IR which might productively dialogue with Pain’s approach, and serve to advance both understandings in potentially interesting and important ways. I use a particular recent work in my field to engage Pain’s analysis in each of three areas: the political economies of intimate war, understanding the body as a space of warfare, and theorizing gender hierarchy in the analysis of intimate war.

AB - It is in the spirit of engagement that I read Pain’s paper with an eye toward the ways in which our thinking about gender, war, and experience overlap, and can contribute to each other. In so doing, I see three current trends in feminist work in IR which might productively dialogue with Pain’s approach, and serve to advance both understandings in potentially interesting and important ways. I use a particular recent work in my field to engage Pain’s analysis in each of three areas: the political economies of intimate war, understanding the body as a space of warfare, and theorizing gender hierarchy in the analysis of intimate war.

KW - gender

KW - intimacy

KW - warfare

KW - feminist theorizing

KW - feminist IR

KW - feminist security

KW - security studies

U2 - 10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.09.008

DO - 10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.09.008

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 74

EP - 76

JO - Political Geography

JF - Political Geography

SN - 0962-6298

ER -