Gender, Feminism, and War Theorizing. / Sjoberg, Laura.

Routledge Handbook of Gender and Security. ed. / Caron Gentry; Laura Shepherd; Laura Sjoberg. 1st. ed. London : Routledge, 2018. p. 59-69.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Published

Standard

Gender, Feminism, and War Theorizing. / Sjoberg, Laura.

Routledge Handbook of Gender and Security. ed. / Caron Gentry; Laura Shepherd; Laura Sjoberg. 1st. ed. London : Routledge, 2018. p. 59-69.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Harvard

Sjoberg, L 2018, Gender, Feminism, and War Theorizing. in C Gentry, L Shepherd & L Sjoberg (eds), Routledge Handbook of Gender and Security. 1st edn, Routledge, London, pp. 59-69. <https://www.routledge.com/Routledge-Handbook-of-Gender-and-Security-1st-Edition/Gentry-Shepherd-Sjoberg/p/book/9781138696211>

APA

Sjoberg, L. (2018). Gender, Feminism, and War Theorizing. In C. Gentry, L. Shepherd, & L. Sjoberg (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Gender and Security (1st ed., pp. 59-69). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Routledge-Handbook-of-Gender-and-Security-1st-Edition/Gentry-Shepherd-Sjoberg/p/book/9781138696211

Vancouver

Sjoberg L. Gender, Feminism, and War Theorizing. In Gentry C, Shepherd L, Sjoberg L, editors, Routledge Handbook of Gender and Security. 1st ed. London: Routledge. 2018. p. 59-69

Author

Sjoberg, Laura. / Gender, Feminism, and War Theorizing. Routledge Handbook of Gender and Security. editor / Caron Gentry ; Laura Shepherd ; Laura Sjoberg. 1st. ed. London : Routledge, 2018. pp. 59-69

BibTeX

@inbook{44b8f66a418a41f9b9a2b07ff9b40573,
title = "Gender, Feminism, and War Theorizing",
abstract = "So the potential for feminist war theorizing seems grim, and fraught with tension. Carol Cohn (2011) made a distinction in the term “feminist security studies” – where she commented that work in that field looks different if depending on which two words you group. In Cohn{\textquoteright}s (2011) view, feminist “security studies” represents a feminist approach to the traditional subject matter and practice of the scholarship of Security Studies, while “feminist security” studies represents an approach that puts feminist analysis of security first. This chapter explores feminist war theorizing from both sides. It begins with feminist {\textquoteleft}takes{\textquoteright} on traditional war theorizing. A second subsection considers what might look different about war theorizing that puts feminism first. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the history and trajectory of feminist war theorizing.",
keywords = "gender, security, feminism, feminist IR",
author = "Laura Sjoberg",
year = "2018",
month = aug,
language = "English",
isbn = "9781138696211",
pages = "59--69",
editor = "Caron Gentry and Laura Shepherd and Laura Sjoberg",
booktitle = "Routledge Handbook of Gender and Security",
publisher = "Routledge",
edition = "1st",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Gender, Feminism, and War Theorizing

AU - Sjoberg, Laura

PY - 2018/8

Y1 - 2018/8

N2 - So the potential for feminist war theorizing seems grim, and fraught with tension. Carol Cohn (2011) made a distinction in the term “feminist security studies” – where she commented that work in that field looks different if depending on which two words you group. In Cohn’s (2011) view, feminist “security studies” represents a feminist approach to the traditional subject matter and practice of the scholarship of Security Studies, while “feminist security” studies represents an approach that puts feminist analysis of security first. This chapter explores feminist war theorizing from both sides. It begins with feminist ‘takes’ on traditional war theorizing. A second subsection considers what might look different about war theorizing that puts feminism first. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the history and trajectory of feminist war theorizing.

AB - So the potential for feminist war theorizing seems grim, and fraught with tension. Carol Cohn (2011) made a distinction in the term “feminist security studies” – where she commented that work in that field looks different if depending on which two words you group. In Cohn’s (2011) view, feminist “security studies” represents a feminist approach to the traditional subject matter and practice of the scholarship of Security Studies, while “feminist security” studies represents an approach that puts feminist analysis of security first. This chapter explores feminist war theorizing from both sides. It begins with feminist ‘takes’ on traditional war theorizing. A second subsection considers what might look different about war theorizing that puts feminism first. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the history and trajectory of feminist war theorizing.

KW - gender

KW - security

KW - feminism

KW - feminist IR

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 9781138696211

SP - 59

EP - 69

BT - Routledge Handbook of Gender and Security

A2 - Gentry, Caron

A2 - Shepherd, Laura

A2 - Sjoberg, Laura

PB - Routledge

CY - London

ER -