‘Frames of reference’ in Victorian England : What Elizabeth Gaskell’s North and South reveals about perceptions of the employment relationship. / Gold, Michael.

In: Journal of Industrial Relations, 08.10.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

‘Frames of reference’ in Victorian England : What Elizabeth Gaskell’s North and South reveals about perceptions of the employment relationship. / Gold, Michael.

In: Journal of Industrial Relations, 08.10.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{721fdd75af064a019f94e9388b4668cd,
title = "{\textquoteleft}Frames of reference{\textquoteright} in Victorian England: What Elizabeth Gaskell{\textquoteright}s North and South reveals about perceptions of the employment relationship",
abstract = "Alan Fox{\textquoteright}s conceptualisation of {\textquoteleft}unitary{\textquoteright}, {\textquoteleft}pluralistic{\textquoteright} and subsequently {\textquoteleft}radical{\textquoteright} frames of reference has been outstandingly influential in the analysis of industrial relations and human resource management since the 1960s. This article demonstrates, however, that these distinctions long predate Fox even though he popularised the terminology. Evidence that observers used comparable frames of reference to categorise perceptions of the employment relationship goes back to the 1830s, and may be found in certain {\textquoteleft}condition-of-England{\textquoteright} novels that were set amid the social turbulence of the time. This article is based on close examination of one such novel, North and South, by Elizabeth Gaskell. It informs our historical understanding of Fox{\textquoteright}s concept of {\textquoteleft}frames of reference{\textquoteright} through exploration of the relationship between three characters who broadly represent employer (unitary), union (radical) and middle-class (pluralist) perspectives. Their discussions about industrial conflict raise dilemmas similar to those analysed in contemporary industrial relations literature: how to forge closer relationships between employers and workers through processes designed to nurture high-trust dynamics while remaining aware of the underlying power imbalances between the two sides resulting from social inequalities of class and wealth. ",
author = "Michael Gold",
year = "2020",
month = oct,
day = "8",
doi = "10.1177/0022185620960511",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Industrial Relations",
issn = "0022-1856",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘Frames of reference’ in Victorian England

T2 - What Elizabeth Gaskell’s North and South reveals about perceptions of the employment relationship

AU - Gold, Michael

PY - 2020/10/8

Y1 - 2020/10/8

N2 - Alan Fox’s conceptualisation of ‘unitary’, ‘pluralistic’ and subsequently ‘radical’ frames of reference has been outstandingly influential in the analysis of industrial relations and human resource management since the 1960s. This article demonstrates, however, that these distinctions long predate Fox even though he popularised the terminology. Evidence that observers used comparable frames of reference to categorise perceptions of the employment relationship goes back to the 1830s, and may be found in certain ‘condition-of-England’ novels that were set amid the social turbulence of the time. This article is based on close examination of one such novel, North and South, by Elizabeth Gaskell. It informs our historical understanding of Fox’s concept of ‘frames of reference’ through exploration of the relationship between three characters who broadly represent employer (unitary), union (radical) and middle-class (pluralist) perspectives. Their discussions about industrial conflict raise dilemmas similar to those analysed in contemporary industrial relations literature: how to forge closer relationships between employers and workers through processes designed to nurture high-trust dynamics while remaining aware of the underlying power imbalances between the two sides resulting from social inequalities of class and wealth.

AB - Alan Fox’s conceptualisation of ‘unitary’, ‘pluralistic’ and subsequently ‘radical’ frames of reference has been outstandingly influential in the analysis of industrial relations and human resource management since the 1960s. This article demonstrates, however, that these distinctions long predate Fox even though he popularised the terminology. Evidence that observers used comparable frames of reference to categorise perceptions of the employment relationship goes back to the 1830s, and may be found in certain ‘condition-of-England’ novels that were set amid the social turbulence of the time. This article is based on close examination of one such novel, North and South, by Elizabeth Gaskell. It informs our historical understanding of Fox’s concept of ‘frames of reference’ through exploration of the relationship between three characters who broadly represent employer (unitary), union (radical) and middle-class (pluralist) perspectives. Their discussions about industrial conflict raise dilemmas similar to those analysed in contemporary industrial relations literature: how to forge closer relationships between employers and workers through processes designed to nurture high-trust dynamics while remaining aware of the underlying power imbalances between the two sides resulting from social inequalities of class and wealth.

U2 - 10.1177/0022185620960511

DO - 10.1177/0022185620960511

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Industrial Relations

JF - Journal of Industrial Relations

SN - 0022-1856

ER -