Feature Interaction Problems in Smart Cards with Dynamic Application Lifecycle and their Countermeasures. / Akram, Raja; Markantonakis, Konstantinos; Sauveron, Damien.

The 14th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (IEEE TrustCom-15). ed. / Zheng Yan; Peter Mueller. Helsinki, Finland : IEEE Computer Society, 2015. p. 1-8.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

Feature Interaction Problems in Smart Cards with Dynamic Application Lifecycle and their Countermeasures. / Akram, Raja; Markantonakis, Konstantinos; Sauveron, Damien.

The 14th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (IEEE TrustCom-15). ed. / Zheng Yan; Peter Mueller. Helsinki, Finland : IEEE Computer Society, 2015. p. 1-8.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Harvard

Akram, R, Markantonakis, K & Sauveron, D 2015, Feature Interaction Problems in Smart Cards with Dynamic Application Lifecycle and their Countermeasures. in Z Yan & P Mueller (eds), The 14th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (IEEE TrustCom-15). IEEE Computer Society, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/Trustcom.2015.410

APA

Akram, R., Markantonakis, K., & Sauveron, D. (2015). Feature Interaction Problems in Smart Cards with Dynamic Application Lifecycle and their Countermeasures. In Z. Yan, & P. Mueller (Eds.), The 14th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (IEEE TrustCom-15) (pp. 1-8). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/Trustcom.2015.410

Vancouver

Akram R, Markantonakis K, Sauveron D. Feature Interaction Problems in Smart Cards with Dynamic Application Lifecycle and their Countermeasures. In Yan Z, Mueller P, editors, The 14th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (IEEE TrustCom-15). Helsinki, Finland: IEEE Computer Society. 2015. p. 1-8 https://doi.org/10.1109/Trustcom.2015.410

Author

Akram, Raja ; Markantonakis, Konstantinos ; Sauveron, Damien. / Feature Interaction Problems in Smart Cards with Dynamic Application Lifecycle and their Countermeasures. The 14th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (IEEE TrustCom-15). editor / Zheng Yan ; Peter Mueller. Helsinki, Finland : IEEE Computer Society, 2015. pp. 1-8

BibTeX

@inproceedings{3ee0998a8d5a4502a112217292f2f61d,
title = "Feature Interaction Problems in Smart Cards with Dynamic Application Lifecycle and their Countermeasures",
abstract = "Smart cards, in their traditional deployment architecture referred to as the Issuer Centric Smart Card Ownership Model (ICOM), have a restricted application lifecycle. In this model, an application is installed onto a smart card by the relevant card issuer. In most cases, the card issuer is also the centralised controlling authority for different lifecycle stages of the application. The installed application might not be deleted for the whole duration of the smart card's operation. The interaction of the application is controlled and closely monitored by the card issuer. ICOM-based smart cards have only one application, in the majority of deployments. Therefore, the likelihood of Feature Interaction Problems (FIPs) is minimal. By contrast, in open and dynamic smart card models like the GlobalPlatform Consumer-Centric Model (GP-CCM), and the User Centric Smart Card Ownership Model (UCOM) the probability of FIPs is substantially higher. The nature of these models allows users to install and delete applications as they require. This change in the application landscape might create a situation in which features (functions) of an application do not execute properly due to their reliance on an application that might be removed by the user or updated/modified by the Service Provider (SP). In this paper, we will focus on the problems related to application deletion that can potentially cause an FIP on the smart card platform. The paper proposes a framework to minimise such problems so the users can gain maximum service from their device and {"}freedom of choice{"} without concerns about application interdependencies.",
keywords = "Smart Card, Consumer Centric Model, Java Card, GlobalPlatform, Feature Interaction Problem, User Centric Smart Card Ownership Model",
author = "Raja Akram and Konstantinos Markantonakis and Damien Sauveron",
year = "2015",
month = dec
day = "3",
doi = "10.1109/Trustcom.2015.410",
language = "English",
pages = "1--8",
editor = "Zheng Yan and Peter Mueller",
booktitle = "The 14th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (IEEE TrustCom-15)",
publisher = "IEEE Computer Society",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Feature Interaction Problems in Smart Cards with Dynamic Application Lifecycle and their Countermeasures

AU - Akram, Raja

AU - Markantonakis, Konstantinos

AU - Sauveron, Damien

PY - 2015/12/3

Y1 - 2015/12/3

N2 - Smart cards, in their traditional deployment architecture referred to as the Issuer Centric Smart Card Ownership Model (ICOM), have a restricted application lifecycle. In this model, an application is installed onto a smart card by the relevant card issuer. In most cases, the card issuer is also the centralised controlling authority for different lifecycle stages of the application. The installed application might not be deleted for the whole duration of the smart card's operation. The interaction of the application is controlled and closely monitored by the card issuer. ICOM-based smart cards have only one application, in the majority of deployments. Therefore, the likelihood of Feature Interaction Problems (FIPs) is minimal. By contrast, in open and dynamic smart card models like the GlobalPlatform Consumer-Centric Model (GP-CCM), and the User Centric Smart Card Ownership Model (UCOM) the probability of FIPs is substantially higher. The nature of these models allows users to install and delete applications as they require. This change in the application landscape might create a situation in which features (functions) of an application do not execute properly due to their reliance on an application that might be removed by the user or updated/modified by the Service Provider (SP). In this paper, we will focus on the problems related to application deletion that can potentially cause an FIP on the smart card platform. The paper proposes a framework to minimise such problems so the users can gain maximum service from their device and "freedom of choice" without concerns about application interdependencies.

AB - Smart cards, in their traditional deployment architecture referred to as the Issuer Centric Smart Card Ownership Model (ICOM), have a restricted application lifecycle. In this model, an application is installed onto a smart card by the relevant card issuer. In most cases, the card issuer is also the centralised controlling authority for different lifecycle stages of the application. The installed application might not be deleted for the whole duration of the smart card's operation. The interaction of the application is controlled and closely monitored by the card issuer. ICOM-based smart cards have only one application, in the majority of deployments. Therefore, the likelihood of Feature Interaction Problems (FIPs) is minimal. By contrast, in open and dynamic smart card models like the GlobalPlatform Consumer-Centric Model (GP-CCM), and the User Centric Smart Card Ownership Model (UCOM) the probability of FIPs is substantially higher. The nature of these models allows users to install and delete applications as they require. This change in the application landscape might create a situation in which features (functions) of an application do not execute properly due to their reliance on an application that might be removed by the user or updated/modified by the Service Provider (SP). In this paper, we will focus on the problems related to application deletion that can potentially cause an FIP on the smart card platform. The paper proposes a framework to minimise such problems so the users can gain maximum service from their device and "freedom of choice" without concerns about application interdependencies.

KW - Smart Card

KW - Consumer Centric Model

KW - Java Card

KW - GlobalPlatform

KW - Feature Interaction Problem

KW - User Centric Smart Card Ownership Model

U2 - 10.1109/Trustcom.2015.410

DO - 10.1109/Trustcom.2015.410

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 1

EP - 8

BT - The 14th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (IEEE TrustCom-15)

A2 - Yan, Zheng

A2 - Mueller, Peter

PB - IEEE Computer Society

CY - Helsinki, Finland

ER -