Fault-controlled base-of-scarp deposits. / Chiarella, Domenico; Capella, Walter; Longhitano , Sergio G.; Muto, Francesco.

In: Basin Research, 31.08.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

Fault-controlled base-of-scarp deposits. / Chiarella, Domenico; Capella, Walter; Longhitano , Sergio G.; Muto, Francesco.

In: Basin Research, 31.08.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Chiarella, Domenico ; Capella, Walter ; Longhitano , Sergio G. ; Muto, Francesco. / Fault-controlled base-of-scarp deposits. In: Basin Research. 2020.

BibTeX

@article{8d52947ebcc944faae4c408960623c80,
title = "Fault-controlled base-of-scarp deposits",
abstract = "The term base‐of‐scarp is proposed for those submarine deposits controlled by a fault and physically disconnected from their more proximal counterpart located on the footwall, although genetically linked to it. These systems differ from conventional fault‐controlled deltas, such as shoal‐ and Gilbert‐type, because they are entirely subaqueous and lack equilibrium morphology—a steady‐state in which the system grows in size without altering its shape. We present field examples of fault‐controlled deposits from the Crati Basin and the Messina Strait (southern Italy) consisting of stratigraphic clastic wedges that thin towards and onlap onto the active margin with primary inclined bedding. Beds are composed of immature coarse‐grained gravels and sand, lack structures representative of wave‐action, and reflect gravity‐driven processes such as debris flow, debris fall, and high‐density turbidity currents. These deposits represent the unsteady‐state phase in which the system grows reducing its slope angle leading to conditions under which the unsteady‐state may eventually turn into a Gilbert‐type or shoal‐water system. A diagram for fault‐controlled base‐of‐scarp (B), Gilbert (G) and shoal‐water (S) deposits is presented, including their steady‐ and unsteady‐states, and the conceptual conditions under which a base‐of‐scarp system might evolve into Gilbert‐type or shoal‐water systems and vice versa.",
author = "Domenico Chiarella and Walter Capella and Longhitano, {Sergio G.} and Francesco Muto",
year = "2020",
month = aug,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1111/bre.12505",
language = "English",
journal = "Basin Research",
issn = "0950-091X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fault-controlled base-of-scarp deposits

AU - Chiarella, Domenico

AU - Capella, Walter

AU - Longhitano , Sergio G.

AU - Muto, Francesco

PY - 2020/8/31

Y1 - 2020/8/31

N2 - The term base‐of‐scarp is proposed for those submarine deposits controlled by a fault and physically disconnected from their more proximal counterpart located on the footwall, although genetically linked to it. These systems differ from conventional fault‐controlled deltas, such as shoal‐ and Gilbert‐type, because they are entirely subaqueous and lack equilibrium morphology—a steady‐state in which the system grows in size without altering its shape. We present field examples of fault‐controlled deposits from the Crati Basin and the Messina Strait (southern Italy) consisting of stratigraphic clastic wedges that thin towards and onlap onto the active margin with primary inclined bedding. Beds are composed of immature coarse‐grained gravels and sand, lack structures representative of wave‐action, and reflect gravity‐driven processes such as debris flow, debris fall, and high‐density turbidity currents. These deposits represent the unsteady‐state phase in which the system grows reducing its slope angle leading to conditions under which the unsteady‐state may eventually turn into a Gilbert‐type or shoal‐water system. A diagram for fault‐controlled base‐of‐scarp (B), Gilbert (G) and shoal‐water (S) deposits is presented, including their steady‐ and unsteady‐states, and the conceptual conditions under which a base‐of‐scarp system might evolve into Gilbert‐type or shoal‐water systems and vice versa.

AB - The term base‐of‐scarp is proposed for those submarine deposits controlled by a fault and physically disconnected from their more proximal counterpart located on the footwall, although genetically linked to it. These systems differ from conventional fault‐controlled deltas, such as shoal‐ and Gilbert‐type, because they are entirely subaqueous and lack equilibrium morphology—a steady‐state in which the system grows in size without altering its shape. We present field examples of fault‐controlled deposits from the Crati Basin and the Messina Strait (southern Italy) consisting of stratigraphic clastic wedges that thin towards and onlap onto the active margin with primary inclined bedding. Beds are composed of immature coarse‐grained gravels and sand, lack structures representative of wave‐action, and reflect gravity‐driven processes such as debris flow, debris fall, and high‐density turbidity currents. These deposits represent the unsteady‐state phase in which the system grows reducing its slope angle leading to conditions under which the unsteady‐state may eventually turn into a Gilbert‐type or shoal‐water system. A diagram for fault‐controlled base‐of‐scarp (B), Gilbert (G) and shoal‐water (S) deposits is presented, including their steady‐ and unsteady‐states, and the conceptual conditions under which a base‐of‐scarp system might evolve into Gilbert‐type or shoal‐water systems and vice versa.

U2 - 10.1111/bre.12505

DO - 10.1111/bre.12505

M3 - Article

JO - Basin Research

JF - Basin Research

SN - 0950-091X

ER -