False Memories and Free Speech : Is Scientific Debate Being Suppressed? / Andrews, Bernice; Brewin, Chris R.

In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 31, No. 1, 01.2017, p. 45-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Published

Standard

False Memories and Free Speech : Is Scientific Debate Being Suppressed? / Andrews, Bernice; Brewin, Chris R.

In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 31, No. 1, 01.2017, p. 45-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Andrews, B & Brewin, CR 2017, 'False Memories and Free Speech: Is Scientific Debate Being Suppressed?', Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 45-49. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3285

APA

Vancouver

Author

Andrews, Bernice ; Brewin, Chris R. / False Memories and Free Speech : Is Scientific Debate Being Suppressed?. In: Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2017 ; Vol. 31, No. 1. pp. 45-49.

BibTeX

@article{ffe67c42226e43b1bb98a1a44276e24f,
title = "False Memories and Free Speech: Is Scientific Debate Being Suppressed?",
abstract = "Commentators have raised important points, including the relative contribution of false beliefs versus false memories and the issue of how findings in the laboratory can be generalized to the real world, which we have addressed here. However, some of the commentaries misrepresent what we said, make criticisms that are unfounded, or imply that our article should not have been published in Applied Cognitive Psychology. We relate these responses to a more general literature on the suppression of unwanted scientific findings and suggest that the study of false memory would be better served by more openness to alternative perspectives.Copyright {\textcopyright} 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
author = "Bernice Andrews and Brewin, {Chris R}",
year = "2017",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1002/acp.3285",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "45--49",
journal = "Applied Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0888-4080",
publisher = "JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - False Memories and Free Speech

T2 - Is Scientific Debate Being Suppressed?

AU - Andrews, Bernice

AU - Brewin, Chris R

PY - 2017/1

Y1 - 2017/1

N2 - Commentators have raised important points, including the relative contribution of false beliefs versus false memories and the issue of how findings in the laboratory can be generalized to the real world, which we have addressed here. However, some of the commentaries misrepresent what we said, make criticisms that are unfounded, or imply that our article should not have been published in Applied Cognitive Psychology. We relate these responses to a more general literature on the suppression of unwanted scientific findings and suggest that the study of false memory would be better served by more openness to alternative perspectives.Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

AB - Commentators have raised important points, including the relative contribution of false beliefs versus false memories and the issue of how findings in the laboratory can be generalized to the real world, which we have addressed here. However, some of the commentaries misrepresent what we said, make criticisms that are unfounded, or imply that our article should not have been published in Applied Cognitive Psychology. We relate these responses to a more general literature on the suppression of unwanted scientific findings and suggest that the study of false memory would be better served by more openness to alternative perspectives.Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

U2 - 10.1002/acp.3285

DO - 10.1002/acp.3285

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 45

EP - 49

JO - Applied Cognitive Psychology

JF - Applied Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0888-4080

IS - 1

ER -