Effect of retention interval on showup and lineup performance. / Wetmore, Stacy; Neuschatz, Jeffrey S.; Gronlund, Scott D.; Wooten, Alex; Goodsell, Charles A.; Carlson, Curt A. .

In: Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition , Vol. 4, No. 1, 03.2015, p. 8-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Effect of retention interval on showup and lineup performance. / Wetmore, Stacy; Neuschatz, Jeffrey S.; Gronlund, Scott D.; Wooten, Alex; Goodsell, Charles A.; Carlson, Curt A. .

In: Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition , Vol. 4, No. 1, 03.2015, p. 8-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Wetmore, S, Neuschatz, JS, Gronlund, SD, Wooten, A, Goodsell, CA & Carlson, CA 2015, 'Effect of retention interval on showup and lineup performance', Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition , vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.07.003

APA

Wetmore, S., Neuschatz, J. S., Gronlund, S. D., Wooten, A., Goodsell, C. A., & Carlson, C. A. (2015). Effect of retention interval on showup and lineup performance. Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition , 4(1), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.07.003

Vancouver

Wetmore S, Neuschatz JS, Gronlund SD, Wooten A, Goodsell CA, Carlson CA. Effect of retention interval on showup and lineup performance. Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition . 2015 Mar;4(1):8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.07.003

Author

Wetmore, Stacy ; Neuschatz, Jeffrey S. ; Gronlund, Scott D. ; Wooten, Alex ; Goodsell, Charles A. ; Carlson, Curt A. . / Effect of retention interval on showup and lineup performance. In: Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition . 2015 ; Vol. 4, No. 1. pp. 8-14.

BibTeX

@article{07649d8ddf044156bfd3192ee0e87e4a,
title = "Effect of retention interval on showup and lineup performance",
abstract = "Showups – when a single suspect is presented to an eyewitness – are thought to be a more suggestive procedure than traditional lineups by the U.S. Supreme Court and social science researchers. The present experiment examined the impact of retention interval on showup identifications, because immediate showups might be no worse than, and perhaps even better than, a lineup conducted after a delay. Participants (N = 1584) viewed a mock-crime video and then were presented with a showup or a simultaneous lineup, either immediately or a 48 h delay. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses revealed that a showup never resulted in better identification accuracy than a lineup. We conclude with a discussion of whether showups should ever be used.",
author = "Stacy Wetmore and Neuschatz, {Jeffrey S.} and Gronlund, {Scott D.} and Alex Wooten and Goodsell, {Charles A.} and Carlson, {Curt A.}",
year = "2015",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.07.003",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "8--14",
journal = "Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition ",
issn = "2211-3681",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of retention interval on showup and lineup performance

AU - Wetmore, Stacy

AU - Neuschatz, Jeffrey S.

AU - Gronlund, Scott D.

AU - Wooten, Alex

AU - Goodsell, Charles A.

AU - Carlson, Curt A.

PY - 2015/3

Y1 - 2015/3

N2 - Showups – when a single suspect is presented to an eyewitness – are thought to be a more suggestive procedure than traditional lineups by the U.S. Supreme Court and social science researchers. The present experiment examined the impact of retention interval on showup identifications, because immediate showups might be no worse than, and perhaps even better than, a lineup conducted after a delay. Participants (N = 1584) viewed a mock-crime video and then were presented with a showup or a simultaneous lineup, either immediately or a 48 h delay. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses revealed that a showup never resulted in better identification accuracy than a lineup. We conclude with a discussion of whether showups should ever be used.

AB - Showups – when a single suspect is presented to an eyewitness – are thought to be a more suggestive procedure than traditional lineups by the U.S. Supreme Court and social science researchers. The present experiment examined the impact of retention interval on showup identifications, because immediate showups might be no worse than, and perhaps even better than, a lineup conducted after a delay. Participants (N = 1584) viewed a mock-crime video and then were presented with a showup or a simultaneous lineup, either immediately or a 48 h delay. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses revealed that a showup never resulted in better identification accuracy than a lineup. We conclude with a discussion of whether showups should ever be used.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.07.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.07.003

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 8

EP - 14

JO - Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition

JF - Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition

SN - 2211-3681

IS - 1

ER -