District schools and the erosion of parental rights under the Poor Law : a case study from London 1889-1899. / Pimm-Smith, Rachel.

In: Continuity and Change, Vol. 34, No. 3, 02.12.2019, p. 401-423.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

District schools and the erosion of parental rights under the Poor Law : a case study from London 1889-1899. / Pimm-Smith, Rachel.

In: Continuity and Change, Vol. 34, No. 3, 02.12.2019, p. 401-423.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{c437def4f5a54cba85a13736da51bd00,
title = "District schools and the erosion of parental rights under the Poor Law: a case study from London 1889-1899",
abstract = "This article investigates the empirical backing for the claim that poor law officials needed legal authority to refuse poor parents{\textquoteright} right to the custody of their children in order to stabilise children{\textquoteright}s welfare institutions during the nineteenth century. Although workhouses were capable of accommodating children, Victorian lawmakers feared children would model themselves on adult paupers to become permanent burdens on the state. To tackle this problem, a system of children{\textquoteright}s welfare institutions called {\textquoteleft}district schools{\textquoteright} was introduced to train children to become industrious adult labourers. Children were usually classified as orphans or deserted so they could be sent to district schools without fear of family intervention. However, children with ambiguous parental circumstances were labelled as {\textquoteleft}other{\textquoteright} and considered a problematic class because they were perceived to be at risk of having on-going contact with their birth families. Lawmakers feared parents of {\textquoteleft}other{\textquoteright} children would undermine reformation efforts by asserting their custody rights and passed the first laws in English history to allow the state to restrict parental rights on this basis. This article explores the claim of unwanted parental involvement, and in doing so, seeks to contextualise the origins of public law interference in the family sphere within a narrative of imposed citizenship rather than protection. ",
keywords = "Poor Law, child protection, parental rights, child welfare",
author = "Rachel Pimm-Smith",
year = "2019",
month = dec,
day = "2",
doi = "10.1017/S0268416019000353",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "401--423",
journal = "Continuity and Change",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - District schools and the erosion of parental rights under the Poor Law

T2 - a case study from London 1889-1899

AU - Pimm-Smith, Rachel

PY - 2019/12/2

Y1 - 2019/12/2

N2 - This article investigates the empirical backing for the claim that poor law officials needed legal authority to refuse poor parents’ right to the custody of their children in order to stabilise children’s welfare institutions during the nineteenth century. Although workhouses were capable of accommodating children, Victorian lawmakers feared children would model themselves on adult paupers to become permanent burdens on the state. To tackle this problem, a system of children’s welfare institutions called ‘district schools’ was introduced to train children to become industrious adult labourers. Children were usually classified as orphans or deserted so they could be sent to district schools without fear of family intervention. However, children with ambiguous parental circumstances were labelled as ‘other’ and considered a problematic class because they were perceived to be at risk of having on-going contact with their birth families. Lawmakers feared parents of ‘other’ children would undermine reformation efforts by asserting their custody rights and passed the first laws in English history to allow the state to restrict parental rights on this basis. This article explores the claim of unwanted parental involvement, and in doing so, seeks to contextualise the origins of public law interference in the family sphere within a narrative of imposed citizenship rather than protection.

AB - This article investigates the empirical backing for the claim that poor law officials needed legal authority to refuse poor parents’ right to the custody of their children in order to stabilise children’s welfare institutions during the nineteenth century. Although workhouses were capable of accommodating children, Victorian lawmakers feared children would model themselves on adult paupers to become permanent burdens on the state. To tackle this problem, a system of children’s welfare institutions called ‘district schools’ was introduced to train children to become industrious adult labourers. Children were usually classified as orphans or deserted so they could be sent to district schools without fear of family intervention. However, children with ambiguous parental circumstances were labelled as ‘other’ and considered a problematic class because they were perceived to be at risk of having on-going contact with their birth families. Lawmakers feared parents of ‘other’ children would undermine reformation efforts by asserting their custody rights and passed the first laws in English history to allow the state to restrict parental rights on this basis. This article explores the claim of unwanted parental involvement, and in doing so, seeks to contextualise the origins of public law interference in the family sphere within a narrative of imposed citizenship rather than protection.

KW - Poor Law, child protection, parental rights, child welfare

U2 - 10.1017/S0268416019000353

DO - 10.1017/S0268416019000353

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 401

EP - 423

JO - Continuity and Change

JF - Continuity and Change

IS - 3

ER -