Character [TM]: Character-writing, Drama, and the Shape of Literary History. / Newman, Harry.

In: Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies, Vol. 21, No. 2, 01.02.2021.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Forthcoming

Standard

Character [TM]: Character-writing, Drama, and the Shape of Literary History. / Newman, Harry.

In: Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies, Vol. 21, No. 2, 01.02.2021.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Newman, H 2021, 'Character [TM]: Character-writing, Drama, and the Shape of Literary History', Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies, vol. 21, no. 2.

APA

Newman, H. (Accepted/In press). Character [TM]: Character-writing, Drama, and the Shape of Literary History. Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies, 21(2).

Vancouver

Newman H. Character [TM]: Character-writing, Drama, and the Shape of Literary History. Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies. 2021 Feb 1;21(2).

Author

Newman, Harry. / Character [TM]: Character-writing, Drama, and the Shape of Literary History. In: Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies. 2021 ; Vol. 21, No. 2.

BibTeX

@article{038a46eea15440c7a6ad7d0bf67da5d9,
title = "Character [TM]: Character-writing, Drama, and the Shape of Literary History",
abstract = "This essay challenges the traditional historical narrative of character focused on Shakespeare{\textquoteright}s epochal “inward turn.” It offers an alternative history that re-shapes the story of character around the cultural and commercial impact of so-called “non-Shakespearean” and “pre-modern” characters. Investigating intersections between the neo-Theophrastan “Character,” commercial drama, and news culture in seventeenth-century England, the essay traces the augmentation of character as a word and concept. Character was a key noun and verb in a shifting lexicon of identity, a new generic brand pioneered and appropriated by Ben Jonson and John Webster, and a rhetorical technology for estranging and trade-marking forms of humanity.The essay argues that the impact of the English Character-sketch—on theatre and performance, on news and print culture, and on the cult of the author—marked a historical turning point in consumer relations with virtual humanity. Character became a popular method of transforming persons, fictional and real, into coherent units of cultural value: dramatis personae, one{\textquoteright}s neighbours or adversaries, scandalized court figures, kings and queens, even Shakespeare and Jonson as historical authors. In shaping this new story about character, the essay suggests that history and its agents are inevitably shaped by the characterological screens through which we view early modern culture, and through which the early moderns increasingly viewed themselves.",
author = "Harry Newman",
note = "This article is part of a special issue on {"}Character Beyond Shakespeare,{"} ed. Harry Newman.",
year = "2021",
month = feb,
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
journal = "Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies",
issn = "1553-3786",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Character [TM]: Character-writing, Drama, and the Shape of Literary History

AU - Newman, Harry

N1 - This article is part of a special issue on "Character Beyond Shakespeare," ed. Harry Newman.

PY - 2021/2/1

Y1 - 2021/2/1

N2 - This essay challenges the traditional historical narrative of character focused on Shakespeare’s epochal “inward turn.” It offers an alternative history that re-shapes the story of character around the cultural and commercial impact of so-called “non-Shakespearean” and “pre-modern” characters. Investigating intersections between the neo-Theophrastan “Character,” commercial drama, and news culture in seventeenth-century England, the essay traces the augmentation of character as a word and concept. Character was a key noun and verb in a shifting lexicon of identity, a new generic brand pioneered and appropriated by Ben Jonson and John Webster, and a rhetorical technology for estranging and trade-marking forms of humanity.The essay argues that the impact of the English Character-sketch—on theatre and performance, on news and print culture, and on the cult of the author—marked a historical turning point in consumer relations with virtual humanity. Character became a popular method of transforming persons, fictional and real, into coherent units of cultural value: dramatis personae, one’s neighbours or adversaries, scandalized court figures, kings and queens, even Shakespeare and Jonson as historical authors. In shaping this new story about character, the essay suggests that history and its agents are inevitably shaped by the characterological screens through which we view early modern culture, and through which the early moderns increasingly viewed themselves.

AB - This essay challenges the traditional historical narrative of character focused on Shakespeare’s epochal “inward turn.” It offers an alternative history that re-shapes the story of character around the cultural and commercial impact of so-called “non-Shakespearean” and “pre-modern” characters. Investigating intersections between the neo-Theophrastan “Character,” commercial drama, and news culture in seventeenth-century England, the essay traces the augmentation of character as a word and concept. Character was a key noun and verb in a shifting lexicon of identity, a new generic brand pioneered and appropriated by Ben Jonson and John Webster, and a rhetorical technology for estranging and trade-marking forms of humanity.The essay argues that the impact of the English Character-sketch—on theatre and performance, on news and print culture, and on the cult of the author—marked a historical turning point in consumer relations with virtual humanity. Character became a popular method of transforming persons, fictional and real, into coherent units of cultural value: dramatis personae, one’s neighbours or adversaries, scandalized court figures, kings and queens, even Shakespeare and Jonson as historical authors. In shaping this new story about character, the essay suggests that history and its agents are inevitably shaped by the characterological screens through which we view early modern culture, and through which the early moderns increasingly viewed themselves.

M3 - Article

VL - 21

JO - Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies

JF - Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies

SN - 1553-3786

IS - 2

ER -