Breaking Britannia's Bounds? Law, Settlers, and Space in Britain's Imperial Historiography. / Laidlaw, Zoë.

In: The Historical Journal, Vol. 55, No. 3, 09.2012, p. 807-830.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Breaking Britannia's Bounds? Law, Settlers, and Space in Britain's Imperial Historiography. / Laidlaw, Zoë.

In: The Historical Journal, Vol. 55, No. 3, 09.2012, p. 807-830.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Laidlaw, Zoë. / Breaking Britannia's Bounds? Law, Settlers, and Space in Britain's Imperial Historiography. In: The Historical Journal. 2012 ; Vol. 55, No. 3. pp. 807-830.

BibTeX

@article{66dc64ac85434ddd8fcd4db503ddce74,
title = "Breaking Britannia's Bounds? Law, Settlers, and Space in Britain's Imperial Historiography",
abstract = "Historians of the British Empire recast their understanding of relations between the metropole and its peripheries in the late twentieth century, notably through the work of the {\textquoteleft}British World{\textquoteright} network and the {\textquoteleft}new imperial historians{\textquoteright}. The former emphasized the material, emotional and financial links between British colonizers across the imperial diaspora; the latter focused on the empire{\textquoteright}s impact on Britain, particularly in terms of {\textquoteleft}everyday{\textquoteright} experience. This article critically reviews recent interventions, which extend and challenge these approaches by seeking new ways to juxtapose the macro with the micro, and balance the exceptional with the quotidian; by adopting a more transnational (or global) approach to colonialism; and by rethinking the categories of {\textquoteleft}settler{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}colonizer{\textquoteright}. Collectively, these works question the traditional frameworks within which both colonialism and the British Empire have been understood. In conclusion, the article considers their impact on the vibrant field of Britain{\textquoteright}s colonial legal history.",
author = "Zo{\"e} Laidlaw",
year = "2012",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1017/S0018246X12000313",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "807--830",
journal = "The Historical Journal",
issn = "0018-246X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Breaking Britannia's Bounds? Law, Settlers, and Space in Britain's Imperial Historiography

AU - Laidlaw, Zoë

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Historians of the British Empire recast their understanding of relations between the metropole and its peripheries in the late twentieth century, notably through the work of the ‘British World’ network and the ‘new imperial historians’. The former emphasized the material, emotional and financial links between British colonizers across the imperial diaspora; the latter focused on the empire’s impact on Britain, particularly in terms of ‘everyday’ experience. This article critically reviews recent interventions, which extend and challenge these approaches by seeking new ways to juxtapose the macro with the micro, and balance the exceptional with the quotidian; by adopting a more transnational (or global) approach to colonialism; and by rethinking the categories of ‘settler’ and ‘colonizer’. Collectively, these works question the traditional frameworks within which both colonialism and the British Empire have been understood. In conclusion, the article considers their impact on the vibrant field of Britain’s colonial legal history.

AB - Historians of the British Empire recast their understanding of relations between the metropole and its peripheries in the late twentieth century, notably through the work of the ‘British World’ network and the ‘new imperial historians’. The former emphasized the material, emotional and financial links between British colonizers across the imperial diaspora; the latter focused on the empire’s impact on Britain, particularly in terms of ‘everyday’ experience. This article critically reviews recent interventions, which extend and challenge these approaches by seeking new ways to juxtapose the macro with the micro, and balance the exceptional with the quotidian; by adopting a more transnational (or global) approach to colonialism; and by rethinking the categories of ‘settler’ and ‘colonizer’. Collectively, these works question the traditional frameworks within which both colonialism and the British Empire have been understood. In conclusion, the article considers their impact on the vibrant field of Britain’s colonial legal history.

U2 - 10.1017/S0018246X12000313

DO - 10.1017/S0018246X12000313

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 807

EP - 830

JO - The Historical Journal

JF - The Historical Journal

SN - 0018-246X

IS - 3

ER -