Blurring the Boundaries of War : PTSD in American Foreign Policy Discourse. / Lerner, Adam B.

In: Perspectives on Politics, 22.12.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

Blurring the Boundaries of War : PTSD in American Foreign Policy Discourse. / Lerner, Adam B.

In: Perspectives on Politics, 22.12.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{eab97289358842d58ad1fc6b001a4c53,
title = "Blurring the Boundaries of War: PTSD in American Foreign Policy Discourse",
abstract = "Though psychic trauma may be an essential part of the human condition, in recent decades its interpretation as PTSD has had important political consequences. This article examines both the political roots of the PTSD diagnosis and the disorder{\textquoteright}s subsequent impacts on American foreign policy discourse. It draws on a mixed-methods approach, including historical analysis of PTSD{\textquoteright}s development and quantitative and qualitative analysis of presidential papers, presidential debates and the congressional record from the last fifty years. Its chief findings are twofold. First, even though PTSD was added to the DSM in 1980, American leaders only began commonly referencing the disorder during the 2008 presidential cycle, more than half a decade into the War on Terror. Second, critical discourse analysis reveals that increased attention to PTSD has contributed to a blurring of important spatiotemporal lines around the concept of war, extending its consequences into an unknown futureand outside the warzone. This erosion has profound normative consequences,considering how it similarly blurs the pivotal ethical distinction between victim and perpetrator. These findings not only elucidate an evolution that has taken place in American foreign policy, but also speak to the more general theoretical challenges of war trauma.",
author = "Lerner, {Adam B.}",
year = "2020",
month = dec,
day = "22",
doi = "10.1017/S1537592720004223",
language = "English",
journal = "Perspectives on Politics",
issn = "1537-5927",
publisher = "CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blurring the Boundaries of War

T2 - PTSD in American Foreign Policy Discourse

AU - Lerner, Adam B.

PY - 2020/12/22

Y1 - 2020/12/22

N2 - Though psychic trauma may be an essential part of the human condition, in recent decades its interpretation as PTSD has had important political consequences. This article examines both the political roots of the PTSD diagnosis and the disorder’s subsequent impacts on American foreign policy discourse. It draws on a mixed-methods approach, including historical analysis of PTSD’s development and quantitative and qualitative analysis of presidential papers, presidential debates and the congressional record from the last fifty years. Its chief findings are twofold. First, even though PTSD was added to the DSM in 1980, American leaders only began commonly referencing the disorder during the 2008 presidential cycle, more than half a decade into the War on Terror. Second, critical discourse analysis reveals that increased attention to PTSD has contributed to a blurring of important spatiotemporal lines around the concept of war, extending its consequences into an unknown futureand outside the warzone. This erosion has profound normative consequences,considering how it similarly blurs the pivotal ethical distinction between victim and perpetrator. These findings not only elucidate an evolution that has taken place in American foreign policy, but also speak to the more general theoretical challenges of war trauma.

AB - Though psychic trauma may be an essential part of the human condition, in recent decades its interpretation as PTSD has had important political consequences. This article examines both the political roots of the PTSD diagnosis and the disorder’s subsequent impacts on American foreign policy discourse. It draws on a mixed-methods approach, including historical analysis of PTSD’s development and quantitative and qualitative analysis of presidential papers, presidential debates and the congressional record from the last fifty years. Its chief findings are twofold. First, even though PTSD was added to the DSM in 1980, American leaders only began commonly referencing the disorder during the 2008 presidential cycle, more than half a decade into the War on Terror. Second, critical discourse analysis reveals that increased attention to PTSD has contributed to a blurring of important spatiotemporal lines around the concept of war, extending its consequences into an unknown futureand outside the warzone. This erosion has profound normative consequences,considering how it similarly blurs the pivotal ethical distinction between victim and perpetrator. These findings not only elucidate an evolution that has taken place in American foreign policy, but also speak to the more general theoretical challenges of war trauma.

U2 - 10.1017/S1537592720004223

DO - 10.1017/S1537592720004223

M3 - Article

JO - Perspectives on Politics

JF - Perspectives on Politics

SN - 1537-5927

ER -