Biological markets in cooperative breeders : quantifying outside options. / Grinsted, Lena; Field, Jeremy.

In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological sciences, Vol. 284, No. 1856, 06.2017, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Biological markets in cooperative breeders : quantifying outside options. / Grinsted, Lena; Field, Jeremy.

In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological sciences, Vol. 284, No. 1856, 06.2017, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Grinsted, L & Field, J 2017, 'Biological markets in cooperative breeders: quantifying outside options', Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological sciences, vol. 284, no. 1856, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0904

APA

Grinsted, L., & Field, J. (2017). Biological markets in cooperative breeders: quantifying outside options. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological sciences, 284(1856), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0904

Vancouver

Grinsted L, Field J. Biological markets in cooperative breeders: quantifying outside options. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological sciences. 2017 Jun;284(1856):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0904

Author

Grinsted, Lena ; Field, Jeremy. / Biological markets in cooperative breeders : quantifying outside options. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological sciences. 2017 ; Vol. 284, No. 1856. pp. 1-9.

BibTeX

@article{4aff74b58233487d8a522a3ef8a5b59c,
title = "Biological markets in cooperative breeders: quantifying outside options",
abstract = "A major aim in evolutionary biology is to understand altruistic help and reproductive partitioning in cooperative societies, where subordinate helpers forego reproduction to rear dominant breeders' offspring. Traditional models of cooperation in these societies typically make a key assumption: that the only alternative to staying and helping is solitary breeding, an often unfeasible task. Using large-scale field experiments on paper wasps (Polistes dominula), we show that individuals have high-quality alternative nesting options available that offer fitness payoffs just as high as their actual chosen options, far exceeding payoffs from solitary breeding. Furthermore, joiners could not easily be replaced if they were removed experimentally, suggesting that it may be costly for dominants to reject them. Our results have implications for expected payoff distributions for cooperating individuals, and suggest that biological market theory, which incorporates partner choice and competition for partners, is necessary to understand helping behaviour in societies like that of P. dominula. Traditional models are likely to overestimate the incentive to stay and help, and therefore the amount of help provided, and may underestimate the size of reproductive concession required to retain subordinates. These findings are relevant for a wide range of cooperative breeders where there is dispersal between social groups.",
author = "Lena Grinsted and Jeremy Field",
year = "2017",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1098/rspb.2017.0904",
language = "English",
volume = "284",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological sciences",
issn = "0962-8452",
publisher = "The Royal Society",
number = "1856",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biological markets in cooperative breeders

T2 - quantifying outside options

AU - Grinsted, Lena

AU - Field, Jeremy

PY - 2017/6

Y1 - 2017/6

N2 - A major aim in evolutionary biology is to understand altruistic help and reproductive partitioning in cooperative societies, where subordinate helpers forego reproduction to rear dominant breeders' offspring. Traditional models of cooperation in these societies typically make a key assumption: that the only alternative to staying and helping is solitary breeding, an often unfeasible task. Using large-scale field experiments on paper wasps (Polistes dominula), we show that individuals have high-quality alternative nesting options available that offer fitness payoffs just as high as their actual chosen options, far exceeding payoffs from solitary breeding. Furthermore, joiners could not easily be replaced if they were removed experimentally, suggesting that it may be costly for dominants to reject them. Our results have implications for expected payoff distributions for cooperating individuals, and suggest that biological market theory, which incorporates partner choice and competition for partners, is necessary to understand helping behaviour in societies like that of P. dominula. Traditional models are likely to overestimate the incentive to stay and help, and therefore the amount of help provided, and may underestimate the size of reproductive concession required to retain subordinates. These findings are relevant for a wide range of cooperative breeders where there is dispersal between social groups.

AB - A major aim in evolutionary biology is to understand altruistic help and reproductive partitioning in cooperative societies, where subordinate helpers forego reproduction to rear dominant breeders' offspring. Traditional models of cooperation in these societies typically make a key assumption: that the only alternative to staying and helping is solitary breeding, an often unfeasible task. Using large-scale field experiments on paper wasps (Polistes dominula), we show that individuals have high-quality alternative nesting options available that offer fitness payoffs just as high as their actual chosen options, far exceeding payoffs from solitary breeding. Furthermore, joiners could not easily be replaced if they were removed experimentally, suggesting that it may be costly for dominants to reject them. Our results have implications for expected payoff distributions for cooperating individuals, and suggest that biological market theory, which incorporates partner choice and competition for partners, is necessary to understand helping behaviour in societies like that of P. dominula. Traditional models are likely to overestimate the incentive to stay and help, and therefore the amount of help provided, and may underestimate the size of reproductive concession required to retain subordinates. These findings are relevant for a wide range of cooperative breeders where there is dispersal between social groups.

U2 - 10.1098/rspb.2017.0904

DO - 10.1098/rspb.2017.0904

M3 - Article

VL - 284

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological sciences

JF - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological sciences

SN - 0962-8452

IS - 1856

ER -