Apocrypha, canon and criticism from Samuel Fisher to John Toland, 1650-1718

Justin Champion; Allison P. Coudert; Sarah Hutton; Richard H. Popkin; Gordon M. Weiner

Apocrypha, canon and criticism from Samuel Fisher to John Toland, 1650-1718

Justin Champion, Allison P. Coudert (Editor), Sarah Hutton (Editor), Richard H. Popkin (Editor), Gordon M. Weiner (Editor)

Department of History

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

84 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Bishop Stillingfleet took the authority of canonical scripture as the foundation of the protestant case. Radical critics, in particular Samuel Fisher and John Toland, undermined this by pointing to the different versions of the canonical texts, the disputes about the canon, and the existence of apocryphal texts which might have been included.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Judaeo-Christian intellectual culture in the seventeenth century: a celebration of the library of Narcissus Marsh, (1638-1713)
Place of Publication	Dordrecht
Pages	91-117
Volume	148
Publication status	Published - Jun 1999

Keywords

Edward Stillingfleet
Bishop of Worcester
Samuel Fisher
John Toland
scripture
canon
authority
New Testament apocrypha

Access to Document

Full Text

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Judaeo-Christian-Intellectual-Culture-Seventeenth-Century/dp/0792357892

Cite this

Champion, J., Coudert, A. P. (Ed.), Hutton, S. (Ed.), Popkin, R. H. (Ed.), & Weiner, G. M. (Ed.) (1999). Apocrypha, canon and criticism from Samuel Fisher to John Toland, 1650-1718. In Judaeo-Christian intellectual culture in the seventeenth century: a celebration of the library of Narcissus Marsh, (1638-1713) (Vol. 148, pp. 91-117). http://www.amazon.co.uk/Judaeo-Christian-Intellectual-Culture-Seventeenth-Century/dp/0792357892

@inbook{7df8a843dcc64c8999d50e1e51431bcf,

title = "Apocrypha, canon and criticism from Samuel Fisher to John Toland, 1650-1718",

abstract = "Bishop Stillingfleet took the authority of canonical scripture as the foundation of the protestant case. Radical critics, in particular Samuel Fisher and John Toland, undermined this by pointing to the different versions of the canonical texts, the disputes about the canon, and the existence of apocryphal texts which might have been included.",

keywords = "Edward Stillingfleet, Bishop of Worcester, Samuel Fisher, John Toland, scripture, canon, authority, New Testament apocrypha",

author = "Justin Champion and Coudert, {Allison P.} and Sarah Hutton and Popkin, {Richard H.} and Weiner, {Gordon M.}",

year = "1999",

month = jun,

language = "English",

isbn = "0792357892",

volume = "148",

pages = "91--117",

booktitle = "Judaeo-Christian intellectual culture in the seventeenth century: a celebration of the library of Narcissus Marsh, (1638-1713)",

}

Champion, J, Coudert, AP (ed.), Hutton, S (ed.), Popkin, RH (ed.) & Weiner, GM (ed.) 1999, Apocrypha, canon and criticism from Samuel Fisher to John Toland, 1650-1718. in Judaeo-Christian intellectual culture in the seventeenth century: a celebration of the library of Narcissus Marsh, (1638-1713). vol. 148, Dordrecht, pp. 91-117. <http://www.amazon.co.uk/Judaeo-Christian-Intellectual-Culture-Seventeenth-Century/dp/0792357892>

Apocrypha, canon and criticism from Samuel Fisher to John Toland, 1650-1718. / Champion, Justin; Coudert, Allison P. (Editor); Hutton, Sarah (Editor) et al.
Judaeo-Christian intellectual culture in the seventeenth century: a celebration of the library of Narcissus Marsh, (1638-1713). Vol. 148 Dordrecht, 1999. p. 91-117.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Apocrypha, canon and criticism from Samuel Fisher to John Toland, 1650-1718

AU - Champion, Justin

A2 - Coudert, Allison P.

A2 - Hutton, Sarah

A2 - Popkin, Richard H.

A2 - Weiner, Gordon M.

PY - 1999/6

Y1 - 1999/6

N2 - Bishop Stillingfleet took the authority of canonical scripture as the foundation of the protestant case. Radical critics, in particular Samuel Fisher and John Toland, undermined this by pointing to the different versions of the canonical texts, the disputes about the canon, and the existence of apocryphal texts which might have been included.

AB - Bishop Stillingfleet took the authority of canonical scripture as the foundation of the protestant case. Radical critics, in particular Samuel Fisher and John Toland, undermined this by pointing to the different versions of the canonical texts, the disputes about the canon, and the existence of apocryphal texts which might have been included.

KW - Edward Stillingfleet

KW - Bishop of Worcester

KW - Samuel Fisher

KW - John Toland

KW - scripture

KW - canon

KW - authority

KW - New Testament apocrypha

M3 - Chapter

SN - 0792357892

VL - 148

SP - 91

EP - 117

BT - Judaeo-Christian intellectual culture in the seventeenth century: a celebration of the library of Narcissus Marsh, (1638-1713)

CY - Dordrecht

ER -