Ms Angela Platt

Supervised by

Personal profile

Twitter: @acplatt87 

 

My Research 

How love is valued and demonstrated amongst religious families of Old Dissent in England, 1780-1850

Examining personal letters, diaries, memoirs, sermons, and conduct literature I am looking at how love is understood and exemplified in families of Old Dissent. This includes Baptists, Congregationalists, Quakers and Unitarians. On the heels of the evangelical revivals, these groups were privy to many of the tensions which developed within this movement - even the 'rational dissenting' Unitarians. While much evidence demonstrates a desire to maintain the 'status quo' throughout these groups, exceptions do apply as these groups assimilate cultural norms and apply them according to their own denominational, church, and family structures and values. The desire for a superlative love of God predominates. The understanding of love, indicated both by feelings and duty, is 'institutionalised' in an emotionalism which becomes normative in evangelicalism. Furthermore, understandings of current and future relationships with God impact the vision for the 'earthly family'. Agency is an important feature for both men and women as they subscribe to these norms, not because they are unable to accumulate subersive wherewithal to overcome these structures, but because they sincerely believe in them - as an outflowing of their love to God, and their understanding of what this entails.

  

Educational  Background

My educational background includes history, archiving and librarianship, family studies, and theology

BA Family Studies & Theology (2009) Cornerstone University

MSc Library Science & Archiving (2012) Clarion University

MA Historical Research (2017) University of Roehampton

 

Research Papers

'Earthly' love vs. 'Godly' love - gendered notions of love and duty within dissenting marriages, 1780-1850. Presented at the RHUL PG Seminar, 15 January 2019.

  • Love of 'earthly objects' was a significant issue found in the personal papers of dissenting individuals in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. It was expected that the superlative nature of love was reserved for God, and all 'earthly objects' - including people - were entitled to a lesser version. This manifested itself in a tension between loving God and loving one's spouse - especially in ministerial marriages. A two-fold paradoxical emphasis of evangelicalism included the importance of spreading the gospel (evangelism) and the salience of the home. This often resulted in gendered tensions, wherein 'separate spheres'  was the expected norm for women who married ministerial husbands - even women who were involved in ministry themselves. Some exceptions do occur but a general expectation is, nonetheless, apparent. Husbands often wrote to their wives indicating how painful it was to be far from them, but caveated this with belief that they must prioritise their love for and service to God over these longings to be near their ‘earthly’ loved ones. For women, the priority of their love for God was often expressed through supporting their travelling husbands through moral support (writing letters often) and maintaining the home in their absence. Interestingly, it was the women who often expressed the most consternation about the wisdom of marriage while they were considering a partner – perhaps because it would shift their primary responsibility from serving God in the church/other philanthropic efforts to the service in the home. Thus, while 'separate spheres' cannot possibly be a lens through which to view all marriages in the 18th and 19th centuries, it is apparent that this theory still holds some relevance, at least where it concerns expectations of the evangelical-influenced ministerial families of Old Dissent.

 

'Earthly' love vs. 'Godly' love - gendered notions of love and duty within dissenting marriages, 1780-1850. Presented at 'Constructions of Love and the Emotions of Intimacy' conference University of Warwick, 9 February 2019.

When spiritual calling takes precedence: women who defy institutional expectations within Old Dissent, 1780-1850. Presented at the Annual Summer Conference, Ecclesiastical Historical Society in Durham, 17 July 2019.

  • The late 18th century saw an increasing tension between the importance of ministry vs. domesticity in evangelicalism. Evangelical dissenting women who married could expect that their primary means of loving and serving God would be within the home. However, the space between these two aims was negotiated with one ultimate priority in mind – the will of God. Women (and their husbands) were willing to ‘subvert’ these norms by relying upon God’s will to direct them. While women in these situations often expressed concern over neglecting the domestic sphere (institutional expectations) they felt justified if they believed it was God’s will (Spirit-led inspiration). This paper evaluates women who proved an exception to this norm by ‘subverting’ institutional expectations as they were led by the Spirit. These examples inspire historians to consider the value of agency often defined by subversion. However, while this religious agency may appear to be subversion, it was actually a form of submission - to God’s calling for their lives.

 

'True Religion' for the Manchester Unitarians: the centrepiece of religious identity for Rational Dissenters, 1780-1850. To be presented at the 'Faith in our Town' workshop, University of Manchester, 17 January 2020.

  • In an era of increasing urbanisation and (arguably) rising secularisation contrasted with growing evangelicalism, Unitarians were often viewed anomalously as they tended to embrace secularism more overtly than mainstream religiosity. 'True religion' was commonplace amongst evangelical vernacular in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, often denoting a combination of two things: extensive loving feelings towards God which accompanied conversion and compelled radical life changes & a stricter adherence to orthodoxy, particularly as it pertained to the gospel and atonement. Unitarians rejected these two principles, redefining 'true religion' as connected to obedience and virtuous living. While feelings and beliefs were important to Unitarians, they did not take centrestage as they did for evangelicals; instead, this space was reserved for trust - trusting that the Spirit would guide their minds towards right convictions, trusting that God would reward a virtuous life of obedience. Rational Dissenters, as Unitarians were called, may have appeared religiously austere, and even predominantly secular - but their embrace of 'true religion' demonstrates the important place of religiosity in their identity. Using personal papers and sermons of three predominant Unitarian families in Manchester (the Robberds, the Taylers, and the Nicholsons) this paper will consider how these Unitarians manifested their version of 'true religion' amongst their church and family relationships.

 

 

Public History

Emotions and Assurance: examples from 19th century Dissent. Presented at WBC, 07 December 2018.

  • A brief look at evangelical emotions and assurance in the 19th century Quakers, Baptists and Congregationalists - and to consider how this subject should be considered regarding faith and religiosity today.

Religious Liberty and the Lord's Supper. Presented at WBC, 02 March 2019.

  •  Examining the connection between religious liberty and the Lord's Supper in the early 19th century - through the efforts of the Repeal of Test and Corporation Acts and Catholic Emancipation - to consider how religious liberty applies today.

Brotherly Love as Unity and Division: Membership at Romney Street Baptist in the 19th Century. Presented at WBC, 29 June 2019.

  • Examined how love manifested as both unity (especially influencedd by 19th century evangelicalism) and division (as it sought to ensure strict adherence to piety and doctrines). This is uncovered in the church minute book for 19th century membership meetings.

The history of the novel : reading as subversion from its inception to today. Presented at CILIP Conference 2019, 2 July 2019.

  • The novel first arose in prominence in the 18th century, in a society which was growing increasingly sentimental; companionship with children and between spouses gained significance. Novel reading grew in this society in Britain. Much could be said about the early novel, which undoubtedly intended to instruct and teach and to offer a lengthier version of the long-held human tradition of telling stories. What is incredibly interesting about the novel is its connection to subversion – it was a ‘dangerous’ occupation for women in the early 19C, a chance for escape in the fin de siècle, and offers ample opportunity for us to consider subversion today. Novel reading offered a channel to subvert realities – to find comfort in characters who share seemingly isolated troubles, to challenge incumbent world views. These stories which encourage readers to challenge current structures they disagree with and consider how to expand those within which they identify. This short presentation gives a brief history of the early novel, noting how individuals have practiced ‘subversion’ (challenged their own and others’ understanding of the world), and how it still applies today.

 

Blogs & Media

The value of religion in women's history; 3 part blog post with The Bedford Centre, March 2019 https://bedfordcentre.wordpress.com/2019/03/16/religion-in-womens-history-part-1-identities/

 

Repeal & Religious Freedom in the 19th century; contribution to Citizens Project MOOC, August 2019 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1EvX7XbYGG8&feature=youtu.be

 

The Beeton Ideal: excerpts from my research on gender, family, and dissent www.thebeetonideal.wordpress.com

 

ID: 28685677