Abstract
The connection between women leaders and superior pandemic performance is likely spurious. This narrative overlooks that women currently govern precisely the kinds of countries that should mount effective pandemic responses: wealthy democracies with high state capacity. This article maps where women currently serve as presidents and prime ministers. The article then uses data from the Varieties of Democracy Project and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development to show that many women-led countries score high on state capacity and that high-capacity states have low coronavirus mortality regardless of whether they are led by women or by men. Arguments emphasizing women chief executives’ superior pandemic performance, while offered in good faith, are misleading.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 951-959 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Politics & Gender |
Volume | 16 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 30 Jul 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2020 |