Why cognitive penetration of our perceptual experience is still the most plausible account

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

320 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	26–37
Number of pages	12
Journal	Consciousness and Cognition
Volume	47
Early online date	22 Sept 2016
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.09.005
Publication status	Published - Jan 2017

Access to Document

@article{2ad56fbbf80242649b9dc809e45970cb,

title = "Why cognitive penetration of our perceptual experience is still the most plausible account",

author = "Albert Newen and Petra Vetter",

year = "2017",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1016/j.concog.2016.09.005",

language = "English",

volume = "47",

pages = "26–37",

journal = "Consciousness and Cognition",

issn = "1053-8100",

publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why cognitive penetration of our perceptual experience is still the most plausible account

AU - Newen, Albert

AU - Vetter, Petra

PY - 2017/1

Y1 - 2017/1

U2 - 10.1016/j.concog.2016.09.005

DO - 10.1016/j.concog.2016.09.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 27667320

SN - 1053-8100

VL - 47

SP - 26

EP - 37

JO - Consciousness and Cognition

JF - Consciousness and Cognition

ER -