TY - JOUR
T1 - What Drives Support for Social Distancing? Pandemic Politics, Securitisation and Crisis Management in Britain
AU - Karyotis, Georgios
AU - Connolly, John
AU - Collignon, Sofia
AU - Judge, Andrew
AU - Makropoulos, Iakovos
AU - Rüdig, Wolfgang
AU - Skleparis, Dimitris
PY - 2021/7/21
Y1 - 2021/7/21
N2 - Support for social distancing measures was, globally, high at the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic but increasingly came under pressure. Focusing on the UK, this article provides a rigorous exploration of the drivers of public support for social distancing at their formative stage, via mixed-methods. Synthesising insights from crisis management and securitisation theory, thematic analysis is employed to map the main frames promoted by the government and other actors on the nature/severity, blame/responsibility and appropriate response to the pandemic, which ‘follows the science’. The impact of these on public attitudes is examined via a series of regression analyses, drawing on a representative survey of the UK population (n = 2,100). Findings challenge the prevailing understanding that support for measures is driven by personal health considerations, socio-economic circumstances and political influences. Instead, framing dynamics, which the government is well-positioned to dominate, have the greatest impact on driving public attitudes.
AB - Support for social distancing measures was, globally, high at the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic but increasingly came under pressure. Focusing on the UK, this article provides a rigorous exploration of the drivers of public support for social distancing at their formative stage, via mixed-methods. Synthesising insights from crisis management and securitisation theory, thematic analysis is employed to map the main frames promoted by the government and other actors on the nature/severity, blame/responsibility and appropriate response to the pandemic, which ‘follows the science’. The impact of these on public attitudes is examined via a series of regression analyses, drawing on a representative survey of the UK population (n = 2,100). Findings challenge the prevailing understanding that support for measures is driven by personal health considerations, socio-economic circumstances and political influences. Instead, framing dynamics, which the government is well-positioned to dominate, have the greatest impact on driving public attitudes.
U2 - 10.1017/S1755773921000205
DO - 10.1017/S1755773921000205
M3 - Article
SN - 1755-7739
JO - European Political Science Review
JF - European Political Science Review
ER -