Abstract
This article mounts a general critique of the public/private dichotomy and its gender-subordinating implications as it is applied in the law. It then evaluates privacy as a ground for gender rights by looking at the role that privacy jurisprudence has played in abortion jurisprudence. Next, the article contends that the problem is not with the public/private dichotomy alone, but with the preservation of the individual (rather than the gender) as the location of rights and relegation of gender-based rights to a sphere where they are both considered less important and pliable. These inspirations for both the privacy and liberty/autonomy frameworks serve to maintain gender subordination, even when they appear to be employed for women’s benefit, an analysis of abortion policy demonstrates.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 527-550 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Cardozo Journal of Law and Gender |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Keywords
- gender
- law
- abortion
- privacy
- involuntary servitude
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver