Abstract
In recent times, clash after clash has arisen between herdsmen and farmers in Nigeria. These conflicts were linked to the effects of climate change in northern Nigeria, but have been exacerbated by other factors including ethno-religious sentiments. Herdsmen forced to migrate southwards face intense competition for arable and grazing land with the farmers in Nigeria's middle belt. This invariably leads to conflicts, often resulting in gruesome murder and carnage. Thousands have died, many more have been maimed and millions displaced because of this crisis. As a solution, the Nigerian government proposes to set up grazing reserves and rural grazing area settlements in all states of the federation. The problem with this proposal is how and where to obtain the land. This article reflects on the legal implications of the proposal and argues in favour of grazing reserves and ranching on the basis of a private freehold / leasehold tenure arrangement, not through the compulsory acquisition of land by the government.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 199-213 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Journal of African Law |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 5 Mar 2020 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2020 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Nigeria
- climate change
- transhumance
- grazing reserves and rural settlements
- ranching
- conflict
- herdsmen and farmers
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver