Abstract
The responses of higher education (HE) institutions towards the climate crisis and escalating social inequalities have been researched from either “top-down” (i.e., institutionally-led) or “bottom-up” (i.e., student-led) perspectives. As scholars call for enhanced insight into the space between these two poles, this paper provides an autoethnographical account of a “bottom-up” network led by doctoral students – Researchers 4 Sustainability (R4S) – initiated within a UK university to contest “top-down” structures by way of disciplinary silos. Likening disciplines to communicative subsystems, we draw on a social constructivist perspective of dialogue to demonstrate how three forms of dialogue – exploring, explaining and expanding – support not just the transcending of disciplinary boundaries, but crucially, institutional hierarchies, in the creation of sustainability knowledge. Herein, we introduce a framework against which to organise student-led dialogues relative to their inter- and/or trans- disciplinary orientations and offer recommendations for theory and practice.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION |
| Early online date | 20 Feb 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 20 Feb 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- autoethnography
- dialogue
- doctoral students
- higher education
- interdisciplinarity
- sustainability
- transdisciplinarity
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver