Abstract
The concept `patriarchy', while being vital for feminist analysis, has been criticised for not being able to deal with historical and cross-cultural variation in the forms of women's subordination. This paper presents a new way of theorising patriarchy to meet these objections; one which is flexible enough to take account of its various forms, but rigorous enough to be an effective tool for analysis. It leaves behind base-superstructure models of patriarchy in which there is only one base, which have led to many of the rigidities which have been identified, arguing instead for a model of patriarchy as six partially-interdependent structures. The paper concludes with a discussion of the different forms of patriarchy in recent British history.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 213-234 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Sociology |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 1989 |